This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: the basis of which the validity of CPH was rejected. This study basically measured the rate of acquisition for beginners, but the period of study may be shorter than the period needed to develop an ultimate attainment level of L2. The best interpretation of this study would be in the first stage of L2 learning, adolescents with higher cognitive ability and stable first language are more advantaged than very young learners. Johnson & Newports cross-sectional study examined the competence of L2 speakers who acquired L2 at different ages. Through a grammaticality judgment test, it measured an ultimate attainment level and the result supported CPH. According to this study, therefore, an age is a strong predictor of L2 competence. These two studies investigated the same topic, but in fact they examined different aspects of L2 learning process through different research designs. Snow & Hoefnagel-Hohles study implies...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 02/21/2010 for the course ENG W2018 taught by Professor Niccolas during the Spring '10 term at Columbia.
- Spring '10