# answer2 - Solutions to Problem Set 2 EC720.01 - Math for...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Solutions to Problem Set 2 EC720.01 - Math for Economists Peter Ireland Boston College, Department of Economics Fall 2009 Due Thursday, September 24 1. Utility Maximization - Second-Order Conditions The following result specializes Theorem 19.8 from Simon and Blume’s book to provide ﬁrst and second-order conditions for a constrained optimization problem with two choice variables and a single constraint that is assumed to bind at the optimum. Theorem Let F : R 2 R and G : R 2 R be twice continuously diﬀerentiable functions, and consider the constrained optimization problem max x 1 ,x 2 F ( x 1 ,x 2 ) subject to c G ( x 1 ,x 2 ) , with parameter c R . Associated with this problem, deﬁne the Lagrangian L ( x 1 ,x 2 ) = F ( x 1 ,x 2 ) + λ [ c - G ( x 1 ,x 2 )] . Suppose there exist values x * 1 , x * 2 , and λ * of x 1 , x 2 , and λ that satisfy the ﬁrst-order conditions L 1 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 * ) = F 1 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 ) - λ * G 1 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 ) = 0 , L 2 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 * ) = F 2 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 ) - λ * G 2 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 ) = 0 , L 3 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 * ) = c - G [( x * 1 ,x * 2 ) 0 , λ * 0 , and λ * [ c - G ( x * 1 ,x * 2 )] = 0 . Suppose also that c - G ( x * 1 ,x * 2 ), so that the constraint binds at the optimum, and that the “bordered Hessian” matrix H = 0 G 1 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 ) G 2 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 ) G 1 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 ) L 11 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 * ) L 21 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 * ) G 2 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 ) L 12 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 * ) L 22 ( x * 1 ,x * 2 * ) satisﬁes the second-order condition that | H | > 0, so that the determinant of H is strictly positive. Then x * 1 and x * 2 are local maximizers of F ( x 1 ,x 2 ) subject to c G ( x 1 ,x 2 ). Note that this result provides suﬃcient conditions for a solution to the problem: it says that if the ﬁrst and second-order conditions are satisﬁed, then the values of x * 1 and x * 2 constitute at least a local maximum. 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
With this result in mind, return to the problem solved by a consumer who uses his or her income I to purchase c 1 units of good 1 at the price of p 1 per unit and c 2 units of good 2 at the price of p 2 per unit to maximize utility U ( c 1 ,c 2 ) = a ln( c 1 ) + (1 - a ) ln( c 2 ) , with 0 < a < 1, subject to the budget constraint I p 1 c 1 + p 2 c 2 . a. The Lagrangian for the consumer’s problem is L ( c 1 ,c 2 ) = a ln( c 1 ) + (1 - a ) ln( c 2 ) + λ ( I - p 1 c 1 - p 2 c 2 ) . b. From question 3 of problem set 1, we know that c * 1 = aI p 1 , c * 2 = (1 - a ) I p 2 , and λ * = 1 I . c. Following the pattern shown in the theorem, the bordered Hessian matrix for this problem
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This note was uploaded on 02/19/2010 for the course ECON 720 taught by Professor Ireland during the Fall '09 term at BC.

### Page1 / 7

answer2 - Solutions to Problem Set 2 EC720.01 - Math for...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online