This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Class Notes for DMOR: Set 3 Sensitivity and Duality Information for LPs. 1 Suppose that we solve the following problem by the simplex method: Maximize 3 x 1 + x 2 subject to x 1 + x 2 ≤ 4 2 x 1 + x 2 ≤ 6 x 1 x 2 ≤ 2 x 1 , x 2 ≥ . Basics z x 1 x 2 s 1 s 2 s 3 RHS z 1 3 1 s 1 1 1 1 4 s 2 2 1 1 6 s 3 1 1 1 2 Basics z x 1 x 2 s 1 s 2 s 3 RHS z 1 4 3 6 s 1 2 1 1 2 s 2 3 1 2 2 x 1 1 1 1 2 Basics z x 1 x 2 s 1 s 2 s 3 RHS z 1 4/3 1/3 26/3 s 1 1 2 / 3 1/3 2/3 x 2 1 1/3 2 / 3 2/3 x 1 1 1/3 1/3 8/3 2 What if the RHS Changes? For “small changes,” the current basis will remain optimal (that is, the variables that are currently basic will stay basic). Questions we want to ask: • What happens to the objective if the RHS for constraint i changes a little? • What happens to the basic variables? The first rate of change above is called the shadow price . The shadow price tells you how much each RHS is worth. This is usually the price of a resource (for ≥ constraints), or the cost of a resource limitation (for ≤ constraints). For small changes, the rates of change above will remain constant. But what constitutes a small change? 3 Easy Case: What if RHS of Constraint 1 changes? Plot the new graph. The solution doesn’t change, and the variables don’t change, except for s 1 , which gets a little larger. 4 Now, what if RHS of Constraint 2 changes? Let the new RHS of Constraint 2 be 6 + Δ 2 . Plot the new graph. The optimal solution slides up and to the right. x 1 and x 2 increase at the same rate, the objective goes up, and the first slack decreases. Exactly what is the rate of change? Solve for basic variables: x 1 + x 2 + s 1 = 4 2 x 1 + x 2 = 6 + Δ 2 x 1 x 2 = 2 5 And what if RHS of Constraint 3 changes? Let the new RHS of Constraint 3 be 2 + Δ 3 . Plot the new graph. The optimal solution slides down and to the right. x 1 goes right at half the rate that x 2 goes down. Thus, the objective is increasing. The slack for constraint 1 is increasing. Exactly what is the rate of change? Solve for basic variables: x 1 + x 2 + s 1 = 4 2 x 1 + x 2 = 6 x 1 x 2 = 2 + Δ 3 6 Where can we find these rates of change? Basics z x 1 x 2 s 1 s 2 s 3 RHS z 1 4/3 1/3 26/3 s 1 1 2 / 3 1/3 2/3 x 2 1 1/3 2 / 3 2/3 x 1 1 1/3 1/3 8/3 Find ≤ slack for constraint i (or its artificial variable column, but ignore all big M terms). Look in that column for rate of change information, including shadow prices. (Or, if you have ≥ constraints, look in their slacks and take the negative of what you see in that column.)you see in that column....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 02/25/2010 for the course ESI 6314 taught by Professor Vladimirlboginski during the Fall '09 term at University of Florida.
 Fall '09
 VLADIMIRLBOGINSKI

Click to edit the document details