slides_lect5

slides_lect5 - Lecture 5 1 Summary of Lectures 1, 2, and 3:...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Lecture 5 1 Summary of Lectures 1, 2, and 3: Technology, Pro&t maximization, The cost function and duality 2 Summary of Lecture 4: Consumption theory 2.1 Preference orders 2.2 The utility function 2.3 The utility maximization problem 2.3.1 Solving the UMP 2.3.2 Walrasian demand 2.3.3 Indirect utility function 2.4 The expenditure minimization problem 2.4.1 Compensated or Hicksian demand Instead of maximizing utility given a budget constraint we can consider the dual problem of minimizing the expenditure necessary to obtain a given utility level. Speci&cally, if we would like to reach the utility level that results in the &rst problem it turns out that the bundle that minimizes the cost of doing so coincides with the solution to the &rst problem. The FOC for expenditure minimization imply the same relation between the prices and the marginal utilities as the FOC for utility maximization. The solution to this problem is the optimal consumpion bundles as functions of p and u . Income is adjusted so the consumer can a/ord the cheapest possible bundle that yields u . These demand functions (one for each good) are called compensated or Hicksian demand functions and are denoted h ( p; u ) . 2.4.2 Expenditure function The minimal expenditure necessary to reach u is the expenditure function : X i p i & h i ( p; u ) = e ( p; u ) Remark 1 Local non-satiation This assumption implies that v ( p; m ) is strictly increasing in m . Thus we can derive the minimal expenditure necessary to reach u , e ( p; u ) , simply 1 by inverting v ( p; m ) . It follows that e ( p; u ) is strictly increasing in u . Properties of the expenditure function 1. e ( p; u ) is nondecreasing in p . 2. e ( p; u ) is homogeneous of degree 1 in p....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/28/2010 for the course ECO 211 taught by Professor Gilo during the Spring '10 term at Young Harris.

Page1 / 5

slides_lect5 - Lecture 5 1 Summary of Lectures 1, 2, and 3:...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online