Antitrust_Unknown1 -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
5969f4a65a0d7162d86f53dfcbfe1ab59c568362.doc I. Defining the relevant market: A. Relevant Product Markets 1. Doctrine of relative equivalencies:   a. If consumers will turn to a competing product when faced with a hypothetical small (5%) price increase, that product is in the relevant product market. b. Cross-elasticity of demand: if customers have historically changed products when faced with price movement, or if prices of different products move together, they are within a single product market. Du Pont , 171 (1956). i. Current prices may not be competitive prices – where the current price is a natural monopoly price (due to patent, etc.) the existing price may already be as high as possible to retain market share. If current prices are not competitive, a 5% increase may force a switch to a product outside the relevant market. (E.g., at some point, all airline prices rise to the point that a significant number of people will drive or take the train.) ii. This may also be cross-elasticity of pricing strategy. Staples , handout (D. DC 1996). c. Similar products or different products from the same supplier may have entirely different demand; hyped first-run movies versus ordinary release or second-run, championship boxing versus ordinary matches. Int’l Boxing Club , 189 (1959); SYUFY Enterprises , 190 (9 th Cir. 1986). 2. Product markets are customer-driven not producer-driven: a. A market may be a use for a product, not a particular type of product. Although a majority of customers may move back and forth, a subset may be captive to a particular product. E.g. , cigarette manufacturers are captive to cellophane, while candy manufacturers may switch to different wrappings. Du Pont , 179. b. Customer may demand certain services be packaged together. Grinnell , 195 (1966); Phila. Nat’l Bank , 880 (1963). In these circumstances, lack of other integrated participants will cause problems for the defendant, because, although they compete to provide each individual service, they are the sole source for the package. c. Customers may treat specific types of sources as a relevant market; where similar or identical products are available from different types of vendors, and both the customers and the vendors consider the types different “markets,” the court will follow suit. Staples (1996). d. The market may be for wholesale customers rather than for the ultimate retail customers. Beech Nut , 240 Supp. B. Relevant Geographic Markets 1. Customer-driven:  the suppliers to whom customers will or can travel in order to obtain a  different product in response to a 5% increase.   Grinnel , 195 (1966). 2. Entry-driven:  the suppliers who will be able to move (profitably) into the defendant’s territory in  response to a 5% increase.   Waste Management , 919. C. Market Power:
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 15

Antitrust_Unknown1 -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online