ma009 - The Lengthening Shadow: The Story of Related Rates...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The Lengthening Shadow: The Story of Related Rates Bill Austin University of Tennessee at Martin, Martin, TN 38238 Don Barry Phillips Academy, Andover, MA 01810 David Berman University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148 Mathematics Magazine, February 2000, Volume 73, Number 1, pp. 3–12. Introduction A boy is walking away from a lamppost. How fast is his shadow moving? A ladder is resting against a wall. If the base is moved out from the wall, how fast is the top of the ladder moving down the wall? Such “related rates problems” are old chestnuts of introductory calculus, used both to show the derivative as a rate of change and to illustrate implicit differentiation. Now that some “reform” texts [ 4 , 14 ] have broken the tradition of devoting a section to related rates, it is of interest to note that these problems originated in calculus reform movements of the 19th century. Ritchie, related rates, and calculus reform Related rates problems as we know them date back at least to 1836, when the Rev. William Ritchie (1790–1837), professor of Natural Philosophy at London University 1832–1837, and the predecessor of J. J. Sylvester in that position, published Principles of the Differential and Integral Calculus . His text [ 21 , p. 47] included such problems as: If a halfpenny be placed on a hot shovel, so as to expand uniformly, at what rate is its surface increasing when the diameter is passing the limit of 1 inch and 1/10, the diameter being supposed to increase uniformly at the rate of .01 of an inch per second? This related rates problem was no mere practical application; it was central to Ritchie’s reform-minded pedagogical approach to calculus. He sought to simplify the presentation of calculus so that the subject would be more accessible to the ordinary, non-university student whose background might include only “the elements of Geometry and the principles of Algebra as far as the end of quadratic equations” [ 21 , p. v]. Ritchie hoped to rectify what he saw as a deplorable state of affairs: The Fluxionary or Differential and Integral Calculus has within these few years become almost entirely a science of symbols and mere algebraic formulae, with scarcely any illustration or practical application. Clothed as it is in a transcendental dress, the ordinary student is afraid to approach it; and even many of those whose resources allow them to repair to the Universities do not appear to derive all the advantages which might be expected from the study of this interesting branch of mathematical science. Ritchie’s own background was not that of the typical mathematics professor. He had trained for the ministry, but after leaving the church, he attended scientific lectures in Paris, and “soon acquired great skill in devising and performing experiments in natural philosophy. He became known to Sir John Herschel, and through him [Ritchie] communicated [papers] to the Royal Society” [ 24 , p. 1212]. This led to his appointment as the professor of natural philosophy at London University in 1832.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 10

ma009 - The Lengthening Shadow: The Story of Related Rates...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online