Unformatted text preview: 4. Millie can defend successfully because it was impossible for anyone one to perform objectively. So it is objectively impossible to perform the contract. 5. $11,770 in Teramos favor. a contract fails to state a date for the completion of a construction project, a reasonable time is implied. In this case, significantly, there was no clause in the parties contract which made time of the essence and the defendant continued to make periodic payments to the plaintiff during the construction. Some delay in construction was attributable to the defendants request that no work at the premises be performed while funeral services were in progress. 6. Yes, because the pisani company had substantial performance....
View Full Document
- Spring '10
- Contract Law, Anticipatory repudiation, Third party beneficiary, Fox Rivera gains