5650 Grp 3 Report 4 dreadnought_The Cleaner 2009 10 25 (3)

5650 Grp 3 Report 4 dreadnought_The Cleaner 2009 10 25 (3)...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The Dreadnought 1 BSIC 5650 Group 3 Report 4 Topic 3 Dreadnought Group 3 Members: David C. Kupfer DavidKupfer@my.unt.edu Jong Sung Lee JongSungLee@gmail.com Candice Leitner Candice.Leitner@dyn-intl.com Tracy Rittter Tracyritter0313@gmail.com Fall 2009 BCIS 5650 Section 1 Professor Vedder BCIS 5650 Group 3 – The Dreadnought
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
The Dreadnought 2 Introduction The disruptive technology of the past, the Dreadnought, was an innovation in war ships in the early 1900s. It has been hailed as the “first modern battleship” (Lovell, 2000, pg. 1). The “Dreadnought” most commonly refers to the fleets of ships made in the image of the HMS Dreadnought which many claim to have been the instigator of the “larges naval arms race in history.” Too, its design was easily copied and, more importantly, easily constructed so the race moved quickly. (GlobalSecurity.org) The Dreadnought design sparked images of big guns and fast, efficient battleships. This report will provide perspective into the technological advances the HMS Dreadnought, and later the entire Dreadnought era, represented by examining the initial problem it was created to address as well as the technology it replaced. The Dreadnought disrupted the technology of the day by bringing together new technologies to answer the needs of society and indeed the world. Three of the key causation factors, war, firepower, and speed, will also be identified and explained. A disruptive technology is one which “disrupts” the status quo. The causes of a disruptive technology are important to gaining perspective and perhaps provide the best laid out example of how and why the new technology took hold. Often inventors can get caught up in the “better mouse trap” mentality rather than focusing on what is truly needed for technology to advance. Here we look at what specific factors contributed to the invention of the Dreadnought and hence the disruption of the traditional approach to nautical warfare. One of the causation factors, war – specifically winning battles in war, serves as the killer app for the Dreadnought. The speed and firepower are frightening combinations that lead to a fleet of Dreadnought-inspired ships and in fact a war-ship era. While war ships, and indeed entire lines of war
Background image of page 2
The Dreadnought 3 ships, had come and gone, the quick construction time and the operating efficiency of the Dreadnought design proved to be the reasons it was so revered. Finally we will discuss the paradigm shift involved in the success of the Dreadnought. The arguments for and against the Dreadnought show how deeply instilled the traditional war plans were in the military. The Dreadnought changed nautical war tactics and brought a concurrent change in war ship construction.
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
The Dreadnought 4 What was the initial problem (ex., the market demand) which the technology needed to address? What was the “old” (i.e., the then current) technology(ies) used to solve or lessen the problem before the new technology was invented? How well or poorly did the “old” technology(ies)
Background image of page 4
Image of page 5
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 20

5650 Grp 3 Report 4 dreadnought_The Cleaner 2009 10 25 (3)...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 5. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online