PHIL 285 - First Paper 2

PHIL 285 - First Paper 2 - Trang Ho PHIL 285 experimenting...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
reasoning experience sensing TRUTH experimenting KNOWLEDGE Trang Ho PHIL 285 February 17, 2010 First Paper I. Introduction Descartes and Plato seem to suggest that knowledge comes from the mind or the intellect alone. Their arguments are wrong, yet they are correct in suggesting one of the factors to approach knowledge. Knowledge is a process of seeking truth, which involves four factors: senses, reasoning, action or experiment, and experience. Without any of these factors to seek the truth that A, one cannot know A. However, completing all of the factors does not guarantee complete knowledge, but only a certain degree of knowledge. That being said, the process is still worthwhile and significant because at least at the end of it, one is in a position that he is closer to fully knowing something than where he started. II. Descartes In the second meditation of his book Meditations on First Philosophy , Descartes argued that knowledge about the external world could only be perceived by the intellect alone. To illustrate his point, Descartes used an example of the piece of wax. The original piece of wax has distinct characteristics: “it still tastes of honey and has the scent of the flowers from which the honey was gathered; its color, shape and size are plain to see; it is hard, cold and can be handled easily; if you rap it with your knuckle it makes a sound”. Yet when he held the wax near fire, it changed its appearance: “the taste and smell vanish, the color changes, the shape is lost, the size increases; the wax becomes liquid and hot; you can hardly touch it, and it no longer makes a sound when you strike it” (Meditations on First Philosophy 6). Although the wax looks, smells and feels different, it is still perceived by us as the same wax. Descartes also asserted that when we “see” a piece of wax on the table, we really “judge” that there is a piece of wax on the table. He then concluded “something that I thought I saw with my eyes, therefore, was really grasped solely by my mind’s faculty of judgment” (Meditations on First Philosophy 7). Although his argument sounds convincing, it still contains a few weak points. First, Descartes seems to overlook the fact that in order for us to make judgments about the outside world, we need to use our senses first. For example, Tom is a person without sight, smell, hearing, taste or touch. Because Tom has never seen, smelled, tasted or touched a piece of wax, he would never understand what attributes to “wax.” Therefore, he cannot make any judgment about the wax, no matter how much he uses his judgment. We cannot get knowledge from the intellect alone. Secondly, Descartes stated that the conclusion that “everything which I clearly and distinctly perceive is of necessity true” (1) is true if God
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/10/2010 for the course GEOG 100gm taught by Professor Dear during the Spring '07 term at USC.

Page1 / 5

PHIL 285 - First Paper 2 - Trang Ho PHIL 285 experimenting...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online