Strategies

Strategies - Phil 3 Winter 2008 Strategies for Constructing...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Phil 3 Winter 2008 Strategies for Constructing Proofs 1. To derive a statement letter or a negation , use Reductio Ad Absurdum. n. p (~ p) Assume . . . . . . . . . m. q • ~ q ------- m+1. ~ p (p) n – m, RAA 2. To derive a conditional , use Conditional Proof. n. p Assume . . Use appropriate strategy to show consequent . m. q ------- m+1. p q n – m, CP 3. To derive a disjunction , derive the conditional to which it is equivalent using Conditional Proof and then use MI to obtain the disjunction. 4. To derive a biconditional , show each conditional separately using Conditional Proof, then conjoin them and use ME to obtain the biconditional. 5. To derive a conjunction , show each conjunct separately by following the appropriate strategy. Then use Conj to obtain the conjunction. 6. Perform MP, MT, and DS whenever possible. 7. If the negation of a conjunction or a disjunction appears on a line, use DeMorgan’s. 8.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/14/2010 for the course PHIL 100d taught by Professor Rescorla during the Fall '08 term at UCSB.

Page1 / 2

Strategies - Phil 3 Winter 2008 Strategies for Constructing...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online