{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

5 Weber - MAX WEBER The Pmtestam Ethic and the Spirit of...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–16. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
Image of page 3

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
Image of page 5

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 6
Image of page 7

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 8
Image of page 9

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 10
Image of page 11

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 12
Image of page 13

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 14
Image of page 15

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 16
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MAX WEBER The Pmtestam Ethic. and. the Spirit of Capitalism TRANSLATED BY TALCOTT PARSONS INTRODUCTION BY ANTHONY GIDDENS Fellow of King’s College, Cambridge CHARLES SCRIBNER’S SONS NEW YORK ! i'i 1. .<' r {i ii ‘ fw- g undert l 22726 Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitafism important pointw—no longer lived outside the world in monastic communities, butwithin the world and its institutions. This ratigigalization o conductwithin a “comma, i. { c the, Wilsfifllléfififi "shim sfrsascetic 7 View fis’flyi T, w iaPrstestsstism. Christian asceticism, at first fleeing from the world into solitude, had already ruled the world which it had renounced from the monastery and through the Church. But it had, on the whole, left the naturally spontaneous character of daily life in the world unu- -touched. Now it strode into the marketplace of life, WWW, .( momma was walla-{mm 'mrwnwmaJ a life fashion it the orld. With“ what ,_ w, mme “wwamwwmcmuwn Mu slammed the door l world, but neither of nor f result, we shallwtry to maize clear the following discussion. 154» CHAPTER V ASCETICISM AND THE SPIRIT OF CAPITALISM iN order to understand the connection between the fundamental religious ideas of ascetic Protestantism and its maxims for everyday economic conduct, it is necessary to examine with especial care such writings as have evidently been derived from ministerial prac~ tice. For in a time in which the beyond meant every»: thing, when the social position of the Christian depended upon his admission to the communion, the clergyman, through his ministry, Church discipline, and preaching, exercised an influence (as a glance at collections of corzsz'lzn, cams conscieiztz’ce, etc., shows) which we modern men are entirely unable to picture. in such a time the religious forces which express themselves through such channels are the decisive influences in the formation of national character. For the purposes of this chapter, though by no means for all purposes, we can treat ascetic Protestant- ism as a single whole. But since that side of English Puritanism which was derived from Calvinism gives the most consistent religious basis for the idea of the calling, we shall, following our previous method, place one of its representatives at the centre of the m discussion. Richardéfiaxterfitands out above many ~._s,...m,« other writers on Puritan ethics, both because of his eminently practical and realistic attitude, and, at the same time, because of the universal recognition accorded to this works, which have gone through many M is? {fin-ij ~ c {A The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capiiaiism new editions and translations. He was a Presbyterian and an apologist of the Westminster Synod, but at the same time, like so many of the best spirits of his time, gradually grew away from the dogmas of pure Calvin- ism. At heart he Opposed Cromwell’s usurpation as he would any revolution. He was unfavourable to the sects and the fanatical enthusiasm of the saints, but was very broad-minded about external peculiarities and objective towards his opponents. He sought his field of labour most especially in the practical prom0~ tion of the moral life through the Church. In the pursuit of this end, as one of the most successful ministers known to history, he placed his services at the disposal of the Parliamentary Government, of Cromwell, and of the Restoration,1 until he retired from office under the last, before St. Bartholomew’s daye HiS’/Q駧,éiaa,a9zteciarrft is the most complete compendium of Puritan ethics, and is continually adjusted to the practical experiences of his own minis- terial activity. In comparison we shall make use of Spener’s Theologische 'Bedenken, as representative of German Pietism, Barclay’s Apology for the Quakers, and some other representativcs of ascetic ethics,2 which, however, in the interest of space, will be limited as far as possible.3 i V j Now, in glancing at Baxter’s Saints’ Everlasting Rest, g or his Christian Directory, or similar works of others,‘1 1 one is struck at first glance by the emphasis placed, in the discussion of wealth5 and its acquisition, on the ebionitic elements of the New Testament}; Wealth as such is a great danger; its temptations never end, and its pursuit7 is not only senseless a pomparejd with _ lht Asceticitm and the Spirit of Capitalism the dominating importance of the Kingdom of God, but it is morally suspect. Here asceticism seems to have torned much more sharply against the acquisition of earthly goods than it did in Calvin, who saw no hinm drance to the effectiveness of the clergy in their wealth, but rather a thoroughly desirable enhancement of their prestige. Hence he permitted them to employ their means profitably. Examples of the condemnation of the pursuit of money and goods may be gathered without end from Puritan writings, and may be contrasted with the late medimval ethical literature, which was much more open-minded on this point. Moreover, these doubts were meant with perfect seriousness; only it is necessary to examine them somewhat more closely in order to understand their true ethical significance and implications. Themreal njgral ohieadmins”.stowrelaaationainwthesecurity,aof P9§§§§§i§lh§Lil§a£lllQflllfillllmsofawealthawithi,_the.,CtOIlSC” QEERicfiiflfiinthfi flesh, {them/tallest}. actionframithepursuit of a righteous life. In fact, it is only because possession involves this danger of relaxation that it is objectionable at all. For the saints’ everlasting rest is in the next world; on earth man must, to be certain of his state of grace, “do the works of him who sent him, as long as it is yet day”. Not leisure and enjoyment, but only activity serves to increase the glory of God, according to the definite manifestations of His will.9 Waste of time is thus the first and in principle the deadliest of sins. The span of human life is infinitely short and precious to make sure of one’s own election. Loss of time through sociability, idle talk,10 luxury,u I57 The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism even more sleep than is necessary for health,12 six to at most eight hours, is worthy of absolute moral conw dermiation.13 It does not yet hold, with Franklin, that time is money, but the proposition is true in a certain spiritual sense. it is infinitely valuable because every hour lost is lost to labour for the glory of God.” Thus inactive contemplation is also valueless, or even directly reprehensible if it is at the expense of one’s daily work.” For it is less pleasing to God than the active performance of His will in a calling.16 Besides, Sunday is provided for that, and, according to Baxter, it is always those who are not diligent in their callings who have no time for God when the occasion demands it.17 " Accordingly, Baxter’s priasipalnnrk is_,.dorninatsd by the continually”.repeated. often pimps! passionate Prasgfiifisblllerdrisqntisusils bodily. 9; mental lahgurlil , It is due to a combination of two different motives.19 1 Labour summonsesascetic tsshniqns in ’ the Western Church, in sharp contrast not only to the Orient but to almost all monastic rules the world over.21 It is in particular the specific defence against all those tempta- tions which Puritanism united under the name of the unclean life, whose role for it was by no means small. The sexual asceticism of Puritanism differs only in degree, not in fundamental principle, from that of monasticism; and on account of the Puritan conception of marriage, its practical influence is more far-reaching than that of the latter. For sexual intercourse is per- mitted, even within marriage, only as the means willed by God for the increase of His glory according to the commandment, “Be fruitful and multiply.” 22 Along r58 Asceticz‘sm and the Spirit of Capitalism. with a moderate vegetable diet and cold baths, the same prescription is given for all sexual temptations as is used against religious doubts and a sense of moral unworthiness: “‘Work hard in your calling.” 23 But the most important thing was that even beyond that labour came to be considered in itself 24 the end of life, ordained as such by God. St. Paul’s “He who will not work shall not eat” holds unconditionally for every~ 0116-25 Unwilliasasss Iaehnfigracei“ Here the difference from the medizeval viewwpoint becomes quite evidentffhomas Aguinahialso gave an?" interpretation of that statement of St. Paul. Bhutmfor hisfiilabsnaisnalmssrssary nzzatyrali l’élliQflé’. _..f0.r. the of individual rdag,chllllllllRl/txalYllQflsllllS a ,_ _ asestolarcenymeaning Moreover, it holds only for the race, not for every individual. It does not apply to anyone who can live without labour on his possessions, and of course contemplation, as a spiritual form of action in the Kingdom of God, takes precedence over the command- ment in its literal sense. Moreover, for the popular theology of the time, the highest form of monastic productivity lay in the increase of the Thesaurus ecclesz'ce through prayer and chant. Now only do these exceptions to the duty to labour naturally no longer hold for Baxter, but he holds most emphatically that wealth does not exempt anyone from the unconditional command.2,,8 gyenvthewealthy shall not eat without working, for even though they do not ne‘éa"’t6‘1n§éfir“ta‘éufiport their own needs, there is God’s commandment which they, like the poor, must 159 The Protestant Ethic and the lgpirit of Capitalism 7 about 139:- transaewitheut exception See’sPravi” ~ dencehas prepared a calling, which he should profess and in And this calling is-not"; as it was for themLutheran,_3°ua fate to which hewmust submit and which: he must make the bestoflbut, God’s .. commandment t0 the individual._to..no.tkforth¢ shrine i: This'seerninglysubtledifference had far-reaching psychological consequences, and became connected with a further development of the providential interpretation of the economic order which had begun in scholasticism. The phenomenon of the division of labour and occupations in society had, among others, been inter- preted by Thomas Aquinas, to whom we may most conveniently refer, as a direct consequence of the divine scheme of things. But the places assigned to each man in this cosmos follow ex causis naturalibus and are fortuitous (contingent in the Scholastic termin- ology). The differentiation of men into the classes and occupations established through historical development became for Luther, as we have seen, a direct result of the divine will. The perseverance of the individual in the place and within the limits which God had assigned to him was a religious dun/.31 This was the more certainly the consequence since the relations of Luther— anism to the world were in general uncertain from the beginning and remained so. Ethical principles for the reform of the world could not be found in Luther’s realm of ideas; in fact it never quite freed itself from Pauline indifference. Hence the world had to be accepted as it was, and this alone could be made a religious duty. But in the Puritan View, the providential character of the play of private economic interests takes on a to: i} Ascetz‘cz‘sm and the Spirit of Capitalism somewhat different emphasis” True to the Puritan tendency to pragmatic interpretations, therptovidential PU{139%emigfilhssiting?,,QflalRWSlSl0 be known, by its fruits. On this point Baxter expresses himself in terms which more than once directly recall Adam Smith’s well-known apotheosis of the division of labour.32 The specialization of occupations leads, since it makes the development of skill possible, to a quantitative and qualitative improvement in production, and thus serves the common good, which is identical with the good of the greatest possible number. So far, the motivation is purely utilitarian, and is closely related to the customary view-point of much of the secular literature of the time.” But the characteristic Puritan element appears when Baxter sets at the head of his discussion the statement that “outside of a well~marked calling the accomplish-e ments of a man are only casual and irregular, and he spends more time in idleness than at: work”, and when he concludes it as follows: “and he [the specialized worker] " A will carrngnt constant cor , . “flmmm..-” w vavrr thétéiore, entertainedHeaths latest, for .m- m‘mw1w,¢~.v “everyone” . Irregular work,which the ordinary labourer is w m-W’ ofien forced to accept, is often unavoidable,but always an unwelcome state of transition. man without a calling ‘ thus leeks-tlis.n:ststnatieraetlitéilisal Cliiiiifétér Whith is, demanded by. Worldly asseticism, The Quaker ethic also holds that a man’s life in his calling is an exercise in ascetic virtue, a proof of his state of grace through his conscientiousness, which is ‘ expressed in. the care 35 and method with which he g pursues his calling. What God demands is not labour 16; tomes.,nslfltsnwss,liaonsnsitcsrtime " The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism in itself, but rational labour in a calling. In the Puritan concept of the calling the emphasis is always placed on this methodical character of worldly asceticism, not, as with Luther, on the acceptance of the lot which God has irretricvably assigned to man,33 Hence the question whether anyone may combine several callings is answered in the affirmative, if it is useful for the common good or one’s own,” and not injurious to anyone, and if it does not lead to un- faithfulness in one of the callings. Even a change of calling is by no means regarded as objectionable, if it is not thoughtless and is made for the purpose of pursuing a calling more pleasing to God,38 which means, on general principles, one more useful. It is true that the usefulness of a calling, and thus its favour in the sight of God, is measured primarily in moral terms, and thus in terms of the importance of the goods produced in it for the community. But a further, and, above all, in practice the m0st important, criterion is found in private profitableness.39 For if that God, whose hand the Puritan sees in all the occurrences of life, shows one of His elect a chance of profit, he must do it with a purpose. Hence the faithful Christian must follow the call by taking advantage of the opportunityf10 “If God show you a way in which you may lawfully get more than in another way (without wrong to your soul or to any other), if you refuse this, and choose the less gainful way, you cross one of the ends of your calling, and you refuse to be God’s steward, and to accept His gifts and use them for Him when He requircth it: you may labour to be rich for God, though not for the flesh and sin.”41 162 Ascetz’cfsm and the Spirit (5” Hopizfalism temptation. foolishness,eniwment of he, and its acquisition is bad only when it is with the purpose of later living merrily and without care. But as a performanceof dutyin a calling it isnotonly morally permissible, but actually enjoined.‘12 The parable of the servant who was rejected because he did not increase the talent which was entrusted to him seemed to say so directly}3 To wish to be poor was, it was often argued, the same as wishing to be unhealthy M;, it is objectionable as a glorification of works and derogatory to the glory of God. Especially begging, on the part of one able to work, is not only the sin of slothfulness, but a violation of the duty of brotherly love accoryling to the Apostle’s own word.45 . "7”" " “ " The emphasrs on the ascetic nnpgrtance of afifised t Wmmwmast v awn—ammwwn was , canineserovidedtan ethicalinstigation,.QLtllelmodenll Sp ‘ ligpwdw " In a similar way the providhntial“ interpretation of profit-making justified the activities of the business mart}:6 The superior inn dulgence of the seigneur and the parvenu ostentation of the nouoeau rz'cize are equally detestable to asceticism. But, on the other hand, it has the highest ethical appreciation of the sober, middlewclass, selfmmade mourn.47 “God hlesseth His trade” is a stock remark about those good men“ who had successfully followed the divine hints. The whole power of the God of the Old Testament, who rewards His people for their obedience in this lifefi9 necessarily exercised a similar influence on the Puritan who, following Baxter’s advice, compared his own state of grace with that of the heroes of the Biblef‘a and in the process interpreted :63 Wealthisthanked fillll(Eel.l§£,93fi}fllll so fares it is s ~- The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism the statements of the Scriptures as the articles of a book of statutes. 0f C011r39,£119._w9£§l%afithchlé,Tfifieffient 3191‘? not entirely,withoutarnbiguity. We have seen that Luthér first used the concept of the calling in the secular sense in translating a passage from Jesus Sirach. But the book of Jesus Sirach belongs, with the whole atmo- sphere expressed in it, to those parts of the broadened Old Testament with a distinctly traditionalistic ten- dency, in spite of Hellenistic influences. It is charac~ teristic that down to the present day this book seems to enjoy a Special favour among Lutheran German peasants,51 just as the Lutheran influence in large sections of German Pietism has been expressed by a preference for Jesus Sirach.52 The Puritans repudiated the Apocrypha as not inspired, consistently with their sharp distinction between things divine and things of the flesh?3 But among the canonical books that of Job had all the more influence. On the one hand it contained a grand conception of the absolute sovereign majesty of God, beyond all human comprehension, which was closely related to that of Calvinism. With that, on the other hand, it combined the certainty which, though inci« ' dental for Calvin, came to be of great importance for Puritanism,that God would bless His own in this life—— in the book of Job only—wand also in the material sense.54 The Oriental quietism, which appears in several of the finest verses of the Psalms and in- the Proverbs, was interpreted away, just as Baxter did with the traditionalistic tinge of the passage in the Ist Epistle to the Corinthians, so important for the idea of the calling. 1:64 Asceticism and the Spirit of Capitalism But all the morewemphasis wasplacedmon those parts of Qldflfsstamsatwhichtpraisafgrmal legality as a sig “Moll/Condu pleasingflto God. They held the theory“marthennsaichas had only lost its validity through Christ in so far as it contained ceremonial or purely historical precepts applying only to the Jewish people, but that otherwise it had always been valid as an expression of the natural law, and must hence be retained.55 This made it possible, on the one hand, to eliminate elements which could not be reconciled with modern life. But still, through its numerous related features, Old Testament morality was able to give a powerful impetus to that spirit of selfnrightcous and sober legality which was so characteristic of the worldly asceticism of this form of Protestantism.56 Thus when authors, as was the case with several contemporaries as well as later writers, characterize the basic ethical tendency of Puritanism, especially in England, as English Hebraism57 they are, correctly understOod, not wrong. It is necessary, however, not to think of Palestinian Judaism at the time of the writing of the Scriptures, but of Judaism as it became under the influence of many centuries of formalistic, legalistic, and Talmudic education. Even then one must be very careful in drawing parallels. The general tendency of the older Judaism toward a naive accept~ ance of life as such was far removed from the special characteristics of Puritanism. It was, however, just as farm-and this ought not to be overlooked—whom, the economic ethics of medimval and modern Judaism, in the traits which determined the positions of both in the development of the capitalistic ethos. The Jews ‘ 165 The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism stood on the side of the politically and speculativer oriented adventurous cap...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern