Personal Computers Lose the pretty face

Personal Computers Lose the pretty face - PC-based control...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
It could be an episode of "Fear Factor": A control systems engineer is forced to perform control of a critical process using a desktop Windows PC! Rational or not, many end users and system integrators fear using PCs for real-time process control. "We have not implemented PC-based control, and I am not aware of any client applications. Everyone I speak to expresses many reservations regarding PC-based control," says David Kennedy, PE, a control systems engineer with Fresno, Calif., system integrator Ginosko ( www.ginosko.com ) . Many engineers and technicians believe PCs are unreliable, and many others don't see a need for PCs in process control. "PCs have too much overhead, which results in bugs in the Windows software that cause crashes, hang-ups, and re-boots," says Paul Parker, a plant engineer with KSL Services at Los Alamos National Labs in Los Alamos, N.M. "Why stress out over this, when PLCs cost less than PCs? What is the advantage?" he asks. When we visited this topic two years ago, we showed concrete reasons for using PCs instead of PLCs in process control. These reasons are shown in Table I, and perusal of the table shows how PCs can be a cost-effective alternative when there is a need for more than just simple discrete and analog control. Even if one or more of these reasons apply to your application, it still would not make sense to use a PC unless it proved to be a reliable, inexpensive, and accepted alternative to a PLC or DCS. Industry acceptance is coming along slowly but surely. PC-based control is a mainstay of discrete parts manufacturing, most notably in the auto industry. According to the Venture Development ( www.vdc-corp.com ) , a technology market research group, PC control also has a significant and fast-growing presence in process control. Table I: Top Ten Reasons for Using a PC Instead of a PLC 1 Networking to higher-level platforms 2 Advanced control algorithms 3 Extensive database manipulation 4 HMI functionality in one platform 5 Integrated custom control routines 6 Complex process simulation 7 Very fast CPU processing 8 Memory requirements exceed PLC specs 9 Interfaces thorough multiple protocols 10 Wireless access "Distributed and remote I/O for use with PC-based control systems in industrial process industry applications is forecast to increase from $143 million in 2001 to $254 million in 2005. This gives PC-based control about 10.6% of the total control market in 2001 and a projected 14.5% of the total in 2005," according to Jim Taylor, a group manager with Venture Development. PC-based control gains acceptance with new and more practical form factors 05/22/2003
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Industry acceptance is growing, but what about cost effectiveness? This is perhaps the area where PCs have made their greatest inroads, and this trend is sure to accelerate. Office-grade PCs decline in price on a seemingly daily basis, and industrial grade PCs now follow the same
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/16/2010 for the course INDUSTRIAL 12345 taught by Professor Mehmettas during the Spring '10 term at Harvard.

Page1 / 6

Personal Computers Lose the pretty face - PC-based control...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online