This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: d. Judicial Conservatism. e. None of the above. The U.S. Constitution generally reserves the power to make this type of conduct illegal to the States, but allows Congress to make some activities illegal. 2. This concept is called: a. Shared Sovereignty. b. Separation of Powers. c. Executive Power. d. Judicial Power. 4. If Congress has the power to make Lopez activities illegal in this case, it must come from: a. Article III of the U.S. Constitution. b. Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. c. Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States d. Millard v Fillmore e. None of the above. 5. In the Lopez case (United States v Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 1995) the Supreme Court ruled as follows: a. That Congress lacked the power to make Lopez conduct illegal under the Act. b. That Lopez conduct failed to have any connection with interstate commerce. c. That Lopez conduct could only be made illegal by a State. d. All of the above...
View Full Document
- Spring '07