ECS1050.10.post

ECS1050.10.post - Unit IV: Thinking about Thinking Choice...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Unit IV: Thinking about Thinking Choice and Consequence Fair Play Learning to Cooperate Summary and Conclusions 7/30 Summary and Conclusions Tournament deadline: Monday by 5pm Graduate Paper deadline: Monday, by 5pm Final Exam: Tuesday 6:30pm, Sever 113 Game theory was developed to solve simple parlor games. In the 1940s and 50s, it was applied to international conflict A THEORY OF WAR Schelling reoriented game theory to seek ways of resolving conflict as an alternative to war. In the Post-war period, attention turned to expanding trade among Western economies EXCHANGE The Prisoners Dilemma exposed a deep problem at the heart of game theory, calling forth a new approach. Finally, analysis of repeated games offered a way to understand todays global problems COOPERATION The Evolution of Game Theory 1928 1944 1950 1960 1984 1994 1949 1989 ZEROSUM GAMES NONZEROSUM GAMES REPEATED GAMES MINIMAX THEOREM NASH EQUILIBRIUM FOLK THEOREM PRISONERS DILEMMA WAR EXCHANGE COOPERATION PARLOR GAMES NUCLEAR TRADE SUSTAINABLE ARMS RACE DEVELOPENT Theory of Games Strategy & Conflict The Evolution & Economic Behavior of Cooperation Soviet A-Test The End of the Cold War Nobel: Harsanyi, Selten & Nash The Evolution of Game Theory 1928...
View Full Document

Page1 / 13

ECS1050.10.post - Unit IV: Thinking about Thinking Choice...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 5. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online