Coopers&Oregon - 5 Oregon goes public(Stock Price =...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1/11/2010 I need to find out if coopers & Lybrand are liable under the theory of negligence for incorrectly advising Oregon Steel Mills to report the sale of stock as a $12.3 million dollar gain on its financial reports. Defendant: Cooper Plaintiff: Oregon Fact: 1. Oregon hires Cooper = audit book / financial report 2. Coopers advised 12.3 million gain on financial report 3. Oregon wants to go to public 5/21/96 (Stock price = $16) 4. SEC rejects plaintiff’s financial report
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 5. Oregon goes public 6/13/96 (Stock Price = $13.50) Proof Negligence Issue: Cooper is liable for Oregon’s for negligence Rule of law: Negligence is required - * Duty * Breach * Causation * Injury Analysis: Duty – Cooper had a contract with Oregon Breach – based on GAAP and GAAS (if it’s below – breach) Conclusion: Causation Court says – no causation because market def is fluctuation all the time. Also, no negligence because nobody Injury ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/23/2010 for the course BLW 474 taught by Professor Su during the Spring '10 term at University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online