This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: because an argument and evidence have to be created. Are her teeth covered with chocolate? Is there a cookie crumb trail? Is the sink wet where she could have already washed the chocolate off her hands? If these details were already present, it would have required deductive logic. The process of elimination would have produced the guilty culprit. The fact that her hands were not full of chocolate is not a convincing argument. They could have easily been washed or wiped off. The conclusion here is that the little girl did indeed eat the cookies. A little girl would not have the ability to remember that when you chocolate chip cookies, your hands get messy. The only reason she brought it up was because she did eat the cookies and her hands were full of chocolate....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/27/2010 for the course CRT/205 crt 205 taught by Professor Dorsey during the Winter '10 term at University of Phoenix.
- Winter '10