Answers_to_specimen_exam_paper2[1]

Answers_to_specimen_exam_paper2[1] - 1 SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO SPECIMEN EXAMINATION PAPER 2 Question 1 a) Heraton Attendance Rev ($) Cost ($) Profit ($) Prob. 50 15 000 19 000 –4 000 0.2 100 30 000 24 000 6 000 0.5 150 45 000 29 000 16 000 0.3 EMV $7000 Atlantic Attendance Rev ($) Cost ($) Profit ($) Prob. 60 18 000 17 200 800 0.4 100 30 000 22 000 8 000 0.5 140 42 000 26 800 15 200 0.1 EMV $5840 So the Heraton venue maximizes expected profit. b) Typical reservations: – The EMV criterion ignores the attitude to risk of the decision makers and applies a ‘long run average’ payoff to a one-off decision. – The EMV criterion ignores non-monetary attributes, such as the quality of facilities and comfort of the venues. – The probability distributions are estimates and subject to biases emanating from the use of heuristics like anchoring and adjustment and availability. – Three point probability distributions can only approximate the ‘real’ probability distributions. c) i) Profit ($) Utility –4 000 0 800 0.6 6 000 0.88 8 000 0.92 15 200 0.99 16 000 1 (see next page)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
2 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 -5000 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 Profit $ Utility The utility function indicates risk aversion ii) Consider the fact that the decision maker is ‘indifferent between earning a profit of $15 200 for certain and taking a gamble which had a 0.99 probability of yielding a profit of $16 000 and a 0.01 probability of yielding a loss of $4000.’ If the probability of winning the gamble was 0.933, then its expected value would be equal to the certain sum on offer, $15 200. Hence a risk-neutral decision maker would be indifferent between the certain money and the gamble at this probability. However, the Academy's treasurer requires a probability of winning the gamble of 0.99 before he/she is indifferent, indicating risk aversion. Similar arguments apply to the other statements made by the treasurer. d) Heraton Attendance Profit ($) Utility Prob. 50 –4 000 0 0.2 100 6 000 0.88 0.5 150 16 000 1 0.3 Exp utility= 0.74 Atlantic Attendance Profit ($) Utility Prob. 60 800 0.6 0.4 100 8 000 0.92 0.5 140 15 200 0.99 0.1 Exp utility= 0.80 Thus the treasurer should prefer Atlantic University, the least risky option.
Background image of page 2
3 e) – it is difficult to obtain a utility function for a group of decision makers like the directors of the Academy; – elicited utilities are sensitive to the framing of questions – questions framed in terms of gains tend to lead to risk averse responses, those framed as losses tend to lead to risk seeking responses; – utility elicitation takes the decision maker from the real decision to a world of hypothetical gambles. Preferences expressed in relation to these gambles may not apply when the real decision is faced. Question 2
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/29/2010 for the course DMVS 324 taught by Professor Muller during the Spring '10 term at Stellenbosch University-South Africa.

Page1 / 8

Answers_to_specimen_exam_paper2[1] - 1 SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online