Comm 200 Threat Appeal Explanations

Comm 200 Threat Appeal Explanations - Threatening messages...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Threat Appeal Explanations Each explanation attempts to explain why a highly or lowly threatening message will be more effective. None can explain all of the results. Steps in using fear appeals: 1. Use/describe a threat 2. Show that the listener is vulnerable to this threat. 3. Present a proposal for avoiding the threat. 4. Tell the listener that s/he can avoid the threat by following your proposal. Drive Explanation: Threat creates a drive to reduce it. The greater the threat, the greater the drive to reduce it. Therefore, the greater the threat, the greater the persuasiveness. Resistance Explanation: As threat decreases, the level of resistance to the message decreases. Therefore, the lower the threat, the greater the persuasiveness. Curvilinear Explanation: A high threat is too painful to process. A low threat is too mild to bother you. Therefore, a moderate level threat is most persuasive. Parallel Response Explanation:
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Threatening messages arouse two kinds of control mechanisms: Fear Control: trying to reduce ones fear. Danger Control: trying to reduce the threat presented in the message. When a message arouses Fear Control, lowly threatening messages are most persuasive. When a message arouses Danger Control, highly threatening messages are most persuasive. Protection Motivation Explanation: As threat increases, the motivation to protect oneself increases. Therefore, the higher the threat, the higher the persuasiveness. Threat Control Explanation: Threat arouses: Response Efficacy: receivers perception of how effective the speakers solution for avoiding the threat is. Personal Efficacy: receivers perception that s/he is capable of enacting the solution for avoiding the threat. The most effective threat is one that arouses both Response and Personal Efficacy. 2...
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

Comm 200 Threat Appeal Explanations - Threatening messages...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online