Cook and gronke 2005b identify what they call an

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Figure 1). Cook and Gronke (2005b) identify what they call an active trust/distrust continuum, in which, at the low end, individuals have a very strong distrust in government (see Cook et al., 2005b, p. 790 Figure 1). This conceptualization is consistent with our study in that we hypothesize that individuals at the low end of the spectrum will have a higher likelihood of engaging in actions to counter government initiatives. 1 This work was funded in part by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. This article has been created by UChicago Argonne, LLC, Operator of Argonne National Laboratory (“Argonne”). Argonne, a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science laboratory, is operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The U.S. Government retains for itself, and others acting on its behalf, a paid-up, nonexclusive, irrevocable worldwide license in said article to reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and perform publicly and display publicly, by or on behalf of the Government. 2 Corresponding author at [email protected] 1 Population Low High Trust Trust in Government Figure 1 Distribution of Trust in Government in the Population In addition, we hypothesize that as a result of government actions and perceived outcomes of these actions, public trust in government changes over time. Thus, public trust in government could increase or decrease depending on the alignment of these actions and outcomes with the public’s goals and values. As individuals change their views on how trustworthy their government is, other individuals are influenced, which could result in a global shift. Figure 2 shows a shift from lower levels of trust to higher levels of trust. A shift in mean trust is presented, which goes from a mean a to a higher mean b to an even higher mean c. The relative distribution remains the same. The progression could be achieved by going the opposite way (from relatively high levels of trust to lower levels) when government actions and outcomes are not aligned with...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online