The conceptualization of public confidence in

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: red; also, it is needed when perception of outcomes is difficult or hard to maintain. The conceptualization of public confidence in government that is 14 used in our model is consistent with Earle and Siegrist’s (2006) trust and confidence cooperation model and supported by empirical evidence presented by them and by Baldwin, Ramaprasad, and Samsa (2006). Earle and Siegrist (2006) found statistically significant strong effects of trust on confidence levels in their experimental investigation of trust and confidence on cooperation (for details of the experimental study and results, see Earle et al., 2006). Finally, in our unilateral-trust-in-government model, we introduce the construct public’s assessment of government’s trustworthiness. We define the government’s trustworthiness as a function of trust in government and confidence in government. Our conceptualization is consistent with La Porte and Metlay’s (1996) model of institutional trustworthiness. This conceptualization gives us the ability to have different levels of trust combined with different levels of confidence influence the assessment of trustworthiness and, ultimately, influence the public’s judgment of the situation that determines public action and outcomes. In this theory, although when we combine high and low levels of trust and confidence four possible combinations arise as shown in Table 1, we believe that individuals may fall only in one of three of these combinations as in the presence of low trust, it is not feasible to have high confidence, since the level of trust caps the possible level of confidence. The low-trust/highconfidence sector in Table 1, therefore, is labeled not feasible. Level of Confidence in Government High Low Level of Trust in Government High Low High Trustworthiness Not Feasible --Optimists-Compliant Response Mid-level Trustworthiness Low Trustworthiness --Skeptics---Pessimists-Mixed Response Noncompliant Response Table 1 Trust-Confidence Interaction The combination of low trust with low confidence produces a low trustworthiness scenario. Individuals who experience this combination will, in general, behave in a noncompliant way since their expectations and experience lead them to think that the actions recommended (or mandate...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/05/2010 for the course POL 3232 taught by Professor What during the Spring '10 term at Accreditation Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online