GallagherMorrill_IPSurvey_Fa06_Answer3

GallagherMorrill_IPS - Professor 10 Exam Name(Exam Number IP_Law_Survey Professor Robert B Morrill Robert Instructor Page 1 of 1 Exam taken with

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Professor Robert. .. 10: Exam Name: Instructor: (Exam Number) IP_Law_Survey Professor Robert B. Morrill Page 1 of 1 Exam taken with SofTest v8.1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
ID IP_Law_Survey Professor Robert 1) Patent Question Question 1 Part A Under Section 103 of the Patent Act, a patent will be invalid if the subject-matter is obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art. The court in John Deere provided a four factor test to assess obviousness. First, determine the scope and content of the prior art. This factor is analyzed using Section 102 of the Patent Act, The Chapman puzzle was invented in 1880 which was prior to Larry's - invention and patent application. Since Larry played with the Chapman puzzle as a child and assuming Larry lived in the United States, the puzzle is prior art under 102(a) because it was known and used by others in the US. Additionally, the Chapman puzzle is prior art under 102 (b) since it was in public use more than one year prior to the date of Larry's patent application (09/12/69) The Chapman puzzle may be prior art under (g) if the puzzle was invented in the US. There are not any facts to support 102(d) or (e). The Gustafson puzzle is prior art under 102(b) because the Gustafson patent was issued in 1963 which was more than a year before -- the date of Larry's patent application in 1969. ~dditionally, the Gustafson puzzle is prior art under 102(9), because it was invented in 1961 before Larry invented his model in 1968. There is no information to support any other parts of 102. Second, ascertain the differences between the prior art and the claim at issue. The claim is a three-dimensional cubic puzzle formed of 8 small cubes which move in relation to each other. The Chapman puzzle is a two-dimensional square puzzle with 15 interlocking squares and a Page 1 of 13
Background image of page 2
(Question 1 continued) Professor Robert. . space left free. The dimensional aspects, the number of pieces, and how the pieces move are different. The Gustafson puzzle is a globe while Larry's claim is for a cubic puzzle. The pieces move similarly in both Third, determine the level of ordinary skill in the art. The court would probably find that puzzle .-J makers were people of ordinary skill in the art. Since both pieces of prior art are puzzles, a pu~j;~;~;::~~:sumed to know of both. Larry might argue that a person of ordinary skill in the art is a toy maker. If he wins, then a toy maker would probably not be assumed to know about the t:~~~~~ of prior art. '1 #-~. .ol ,/ Fourth, utilize secondary considerations. Here, Larry has never sold his patented product, but he has an public and thus not obvious. Lj ~ . The federal courts impose a fifth factor: look for a teaching, suggestion, or motivation to combine the prior art. Larry will argue that the Chapman puzzle alone does not suggest creating a three-dimensional puzzle with interlocking parts and the Gustafson puzzle does not in any way suggest that the puzzle could be made into a cube. Ideal will argue that Chapman square puzzle combined with the interlocking nature of Gustafson puzzle make it readily
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/05/2010 for the course LAW LAW6571 taught by Professor Abbott during the Spring '10 term at Florida State College.

Page1 / 13

GallagherMorrill_IPS - Professor 10 Exam Name(Exam Number IP_Law_Survey Professor Robert B Morrill Robert Instructor Page 1 of 1 Exam taken with

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online