Exam Review - Exam Review Spring 2007 Park is clearly a pub...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Exam Review Spring 2007 Park is clearly a pub forum issue Fighting words statute is under inclusive, in a way, bc it is conditioned on presence of the object State action issue No Unconst. Conditions issue bc no benefit conferred directly by state Establishment Clause issue w/ religious language but not a huge issue No casino or booze jobs for loan recipients may not meet RR bc facts show shear animosity Fall 2007 1. Scarf tax is facially neutral, disproportionate effect on minority and enough evidence to bring Arlington heights into play; Feeney definition of intent 2. Main issue we didn’t cover is determining the definition of commercial speech regarding the add claiming the scarves fund terrorists HOA has two issues 3. State Action o No direct state actions but neighborhood conducts a lot of govt functions, however not much exclusive state action, BUT state has a history of engaging in involving itself in HOA issues 4. Content of ban is straight up free speech
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 2

Exam Review - Exam Review Spring 2007 Park is clearly a pub...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online