Expectation Damages Cost of Comp. v. Δ in Market Val. Excuse of Condition Pol: Non-breaching party entitled to benefit of bargain; to be situated as if no breach . (Direct and Consequential Loss of Bargain) + (Reliance Costs) – (Avoidable Costs) – (Loss Avoided from Breach). Direct – foreseeable, cause, calculable Consequential – foreseeable, cause, calculable Cost of Completion :-Use when lower than Δ market val. OR-When performance is central to K; OR-Breach is intentional OR ( pol: breacher shouldn’t determine )-Completion woudn’t req gross waste-Pol: give peeps idiosyncratic value sought Δ in Market Val .-Incidental OR unintentional AND waste-Pol: Avoid giving windfalls for “completion” of things no longer worth it-Forfeiture : excuse to condition enforcement of which would result in harsh deprivation or windfall-Materiality : can’t be material (ct may fudge)-Fault : SPLIT: some no fault; others only negligenc-Impact : SPLIT: some require NO impact to non- breacher; Others balance impacts-Pol: discourage rent seeking (money for nothin’)-Wrongful Prevention : bad faith avoid/prevent condit.-Estoppel : reliance on other party saying cond. Met-Waiver : Wvr of immaterial condition by party owed -Waiver of material cond. req’s consideration Consequential Damages Foreseeable – w/in reasonable contemplation of both parties, @time of K-Pol: Limitation allows for efficient breach, -want peeps to breach if cost of performance is higher than expected benefit to both parties-Criticism: Eff.Brch doesn’t see non-econ factors; imperfect info; marginal cost of breach may subsume savings Causation – Proximate Calculation – must be reasonably calculable
This is the end of the preview. Sign up
access the rest of the document.