AtiyahSolutions

# AtiyahSolutions - Adam Allan Solutions to Atiyah Macdonald...

This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Adam Allan Solutions to Atiyah Macdonald 1 Chapter 1 : Rings and Ideals 1.1. Show that the sum of a nilpotent element and a unit is a unit. If x is nilpotent, then 1- x is a unit with inverse ∑ ∞ i =0 x i . So if u is a unit and x is nilpotent, then v = 1- (- u- 1 x ) is a unit since- u- 1 x is nilpotent. Hence, u + x = uv is a unit as well. 1.2. Let A be a ring with f = a + a 1 x + ··· + a n x n in A [ x ] . a. Show that f is a unit iff a is a unit and a 1 ,...,a n are nilpotent. If a 1 ,...,a n are nilpotent in A , then a 1 x,...,a n x n are nilpotent in A [ x ]. Since the sum of nilpotent elements is nilpotent, a 1 x + ··· + a n x n is nilpotent. So f = a + ( a 1 x + ··· + a n x n ) is a unit when a is a unit by exercise 1.1. Now suppose that f is a unit in A [ x ] and let g = b + b 1 x + ··· + b m x m satisfy fg = 1. Then a b = 1, and so a is a unit in A [ x ]. Notice that a n b m = 0, and suppose that 0 ≤ r ≤ m- 1 satisfies a r +1 n b m- r = a r n b m- r- 1 = ··· = a n b m = 0 Notice that 0 = fg = m + n X i =0 i X j =0 a j b i- j x i = m + n X i =0 c i x i where we define a j = 0 for j > n and b j = 0 for j > m . This means that each c i = 0, and so 0 = a r +1 n c m + n- r- 1 = n X j =0 a j a r +1 n b m + n- r- 1- j = a r +2 n b m- r- 1 since m + n- r- 1- j ≥ m- r for j ≤ n- 1. So by induction a m +1 n b = 0. Since b is a unit, we conclude that a n is nilpotent. This means that f- a n x n is a unit since a n x n is nilpotent and f is a unit. By induction, a 1 ,...,a n are all nilpotent. b. Show that f is nilpotent iff a ,...,a n are nilpotent. Clearly f = a + a 1 x + ... + a n x n is nilpotent if a ,...,a n are nilpotent. Assume f is nilpotent and that f m = 0 for m ∈ N . Then in particular ( a n x n ) m = 0, and so a n x n is nilpotent. Thus, f- a n x n is nilpotent. By induction, a k x k is nilpotent for all k . This means that a ,...,a n are nilpotent. c. Show that f is zero-divisor iff bf = 0 for some b 6 = 0 . If there is b 6 = 0 for which bf = 0, then f is clearly a zero-divisor. So suppose f is a zero-divisor and choose a nonzero g = b + b 1 x + ··· + b m x m of minimal degree for which fg = 0. Then in particular, a n b m = 0. Since a n g · f = 0 and a n g = a n b + ··· + a n b m- 1 x m- 1 , we conclude that a n g = 0 by minimality. Hence, a n b k = 0 for all k . Suppose that a n- r b k = a n- r +1 b k = ··· = a n b k = 0 for all k Then as in part a we obtain the equation 0 = m + n- r- 1 X j =0 a m + n- r- 1- j b j = a n- r- 1 b m 2 Again we conclude that a n- r- 1 g = 0. Hence, by induction a j b k = 0 for all j,k . Choose k so that b = b k 6 = 0. Then bf = 0 with b 6 = 0. d. Prove that f,g are primitive iff fg is primitive....
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 04/06/2010 for the course MATH various taught by Professor Tao/analysis during the Spring '10 term at UCLA.

### Page1 / 88

AtiyahSolutions - Adam Allan Solutions to Atiyah Macdonald...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online