This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
Problem Set 5
Practice for Prelim 2
Due Tuesday 04/13/10 at the beginning of class
Econ 3200  Introduction to Econometrics
Spring 2010
Cornell University
Prof. Molinari
The exam will consist of TWO parts totaling 100 points. It will be a CLOSED BOOK exam.
However, useful formulae will be provided, and you can ±nd them here on pages 5+. Calculators
Normal,
t
,
2
and
F
of these Tables will be attached to the text of the exam. You will have 75 minutes
to complete
the exam.
Part 1
20 points (4 points each)
In
WORDS
, brie²y
(1 paragraph maximum) describe the following:
1. OLS Estimator.
2. Total Sum of Squares.
3. Multicollinearity.
4. Interpreting the slope coe¢ cient of a loglevel regression.
5. VarianceCovariance Matrix.
1
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentPart 2
80 points (Each subquestion has the number of corresponding points in brackets)
This part of the homework consists of a series of questions related to real empirical appli
cations.
1. We have often talked in class about regression models that are used to explain wages.
In this question we take a closer look at a wage regression. A random sample of 936
individuals was gathered for the following variables:
ln(
wage
)
= natural log of hourly
wage,
educ
= years of education,
exper
= years of experience. Assume for now that
assumptions MLR1MLR5 hold for
ln(
wage
i
) =
&
0
+
1
educ
i
+
2
exper
i
+
u
i
:
(1)
This regression was estimated by OLS yielding the following:
ln(
w
b
age
i
) = 0
:
42
+0
:
072
educ
i
+0
:
020
exper
i
(0
:
0072)
R
2
= 0
:
096
SSR
= 173
:
4
SST
= 192
:
0
(2)
In addition, the following two variable regression models were estimated. Standard errors
are in parentheses:
ln(
w
b
age
i
)
=
0
:
91
+0
:
053
educ
i
R
2
= 0
:
0658
SSR
= 179
:
4
SST
= 192
:
0
(0
:
052)
(0
:
006)
(3)
ln(
w
b
age
i
)
=
1
:
57
+0
:
004
exper
i
R
2
= 0
:
0016
SSR
= 191
:
7
SST
= 192
:
0
(0
:
042)
(0
:
0033)
(4)
e
b
duc
i
=
16
:
11
&
0
:
229
exper
i
R
2
= 0
:
207
SSR
= 3571
:
4
SST
= 4506
:
8
(0
:
181)
(0
:
014)
(5)
(a) Interpret the estimates of
1
and
2
in the regression of
ln(
wage
)
on
educ
and
exper
. Do these estimates make sense? Do the estimates suggest that education and
experience have a big e/ect on wages? Why or why not?
This is the end of the preview. Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.
 Spring '08
 NEILSEN
 Econometrics

Click to edit the document details