SIMON FRASER phil001 1077001week4#2part

SIMON FRASER phil001 1077001week4#2part - Dr Mcs Philosophy...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Dr Mc’s Philosophy 001 (1077) Part Notes, Week4#2 © “Diagrams” of the logical space Arguments Invalid arguments Since validity is a matter of __________, the __________________ of the premises and conclusion don’t matter. That’s why we can use _______________________ . An argument is valid iff it ___________________ such that it is __________ for any argument following that pattern to have true premises and a false conclusion. The definition is “____________________”. - - Why isn’t enough to know, say, that an argument is valid in order to know whether you should accept its conclusion? How do you know whether an argument that would use predicate logic is intended to be ___________________________? If each of its premises and its conclusion can be ________________ ___________________________, it is intended to be _______. 1077001week4#2part 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Can “Most A are B” be translated into one of these? -
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/15/2010 for the course PHIL 001 taught by Professor Peterhorban during the Fall '09 term at Simon Fraser.

Page1 / 4

SIMON FRASER phil001 1077001week4#2part - Dr Mcs Philosophy...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online