Criteria_for_Peer_Evaluation_Review 030510

Criteria_for_Peer_Evaluation_Review 030510 - Criteria for...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Criteria for Peer Review Instructions 1) Read your assigned draft paper. 2) After you read the paper once, describe 3 strengths + 3 weaknesses of the paper you are reviewing based on the following 5 sets of criteria. You do not have to answer all of the questions/criteria listed below, but you should try to make comments based on a mix of each of the 5 criteria. 3) You must type up a 1-page response for your evaluation. 4) Bring 2 hard copies of your evaluation to discussion on March 19 th (unless you have already made other arrangements with Carmen but you must bring these documents to your meeting); also each person should bring to class a copy of their own paper, plus the paper they are evaluating to have as reference for the discussion. 5) Part of your grade for this writing assignment will be based on this peer review process. This portion of the grade will consist of: submitting a draft paper, thorough and specific comments in your 1-page peer evaluation, participating in the discussion of the papers, and revising your paper in light of peer comments. Paper evaluation criteria
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/17/2010 for the course S&TS 2011 taught by Professor Pinch,t. during the Spring '06 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Page1 / 2

Criteria_for_Peer_Evaluation_Review 030510 - Criteria for...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online