This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: WORKING TO UNDERSTAND GROUNDWATER QUALITY IN THE NORTHERN SACRAMENTO VALLEY
Allan Fulton1, in cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), Northern District, Groundwater Section22 INTRODUCTION
The previous article in this informational series on groundwater topics discussed basic principles pertaining to groundwater quality and provided an overview of current groundwater quality monitoring activities underway in the north valley. This article is a continuation of the discussion on groundwater quality and highlights some ﬁndings from ongoing water quality monitoring programs in the north valley. USE OF DEDICATED MONITORING WELLS
Northern District, Department of Water Resources (DWR) collaborates with counties, water purveyors, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) to monitor groundwater quality in dedicated monitoring wells throughout the Northern Sacramento Valley. Figure 1 shows, at present, 45 dedicated monitoring wells in the north valley and Figure 2 shows how the monitoring wells are constructed to sample groundwater from discrete aquifer intervals. Tehama County Glenn County Butte County Colusa County IMPORTANT GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS
Simple physical and chemical attributes Temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity (EC) are commonly measured. Groundwater temperature is generally higher than surface water and becomes warmer with depth due to the earth’s natural thermal gradient of about 1.5°F per 100 feet. Monitoring groundwater temperature gives insight as to how groundwater might be managed to compliment surface water supplies and provides insight about different aquifer systems. The pH of groundwater indicates whether a water source is alkaline, neutral, or acidic. EC is a simple indicator of the level of dissolved minerals in groundwater. EC and pH are inexpensive water quality characteristics that are helpful to recognize change and to assess suitability. Mineral composition Figure 1. Dedicated monitoring wells in the northern Sacramento Valley sampled for water quality. Surface Seals Silt and clay Sand (water bearing) Clay Gravel (water bearing) Clay Well Screens Bentonite Seals Filter Packs Minerals or salts from geological materials in discrete aquifers are dissolved Gravel (water bearing) in groundwater and exist mostly as disassociated cations and anions. The major cations are calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), and Clay to a lesser extent potassium (K). The primary anions are bicarbonate or carbonate (HCO3 and CO3), chloride (Cl), and sulfate (SO4). Boron Figure 5. Example of discrete aquifer sampling (H3BO3) and nitrate (NO3) are also present in groundwater as anions but at lower concentrations. Over long periods of time, the mineral composition Figure 2. Example of discrete aquifer sampling with dedicated monitoring wells. of the groundwater will change due to the capacity of the clays, silts, and organic materials to adsorb and release cations and anions. Understanding the mineral composition is valuable to assess groundwater suitability for a variety of uses. Analysis of minerals constituents may also help discern discrete aquifer systems and to form management strategies to protect freshwater aquifer systems from saline aquifer systems. Isotopes of Natural Occurring Elements Natural occurring elements may have two or more atomic structures that are referred to as isotopes. Oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, and helium, are all natural occuring elements with isotopes. They can be used for age dating of groundwater and help understand recharge areas and hydrologic connections between aquafier systems.
1 University of California Cooperative Extension, Tehama County, 745 Walnut Street, Red Bluff, CA 96080 (530)-527-3101 2 California Department of Water Resources, Northern District, 440 Main Street, Red Bluff, CA 96080 (530)-529-7373 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of authors and may not reﬂect the views of the State of California, Department of Water Resources. Hydrogen-3 (tritium) is a naturally occurring isotope at very low levels in the atmosphere with a relative short half-life of 12.3 years. Levels of tritium in the atmosphere have been elevated signiﬁcantly in the past 50 years. Levels of tritium in precipitation that percolates into groundwater can be used to distinguish “modern recharge” (less than 50 years in age), from “pre-modern” recharge (greater than 50 years in age). Similarly, carbon-14 (14C) is also present in the atmosphere and falls to the earth with precipitation. However, its half-life is 5,730 years enabling it to be used to identify groundwater that has been stored in discrete aquifers for 1,000 to 50,000 years. Another isotope used in groundwater age dating is the helium isotope (4He). It results from the decay of naturally occurring uranium and thorium. High levels of 4He also indicate groundwater older than 10,000 years. Oxygen has three isotopes (16O, 17O, and 18O). Oxygen-16 is the most common atom with 16 protons and 16 neutrons in its nucleus. Oxygen-18 (18O) also has 16 protons in the nucleus but instead has 18 neutrons in its nucleus. The additional neutrons increase the mass of the atom. The amount of 18O found in precipitation varies depending on temperature, elevation, and latitude. Because of its larger mass, 18O atoms tend to “drop out” with precipitation at lower elevations. Precipitation in higher mountain watersheds has less 18O atoms than at the valley ﬂoor. The relative differences in the number of 18O atoms in groundwater may provide an isotopic characteristic that helps understand the extent that groundwater recharge of discrete aquifers occurs from stream ﬂow originating in the higher watersheds and rainfall occurring in the valley. Trace elements and human induced constituents Trace metals may occur naturally in groundwater or possibly associated with human activities. Other examples of potential human induced constituents are synthetic chemicals, nitrates, and antibiotics. Understanding their extent is important to assure healthy drinking water supplies. HIGHLIGHTED FINDINGS
Selected ﬁndings from ongoing groundwater quality monitoring in the northern Sacramento Valley are presented in this section. Speciﬁcally, results from investigations into mineral composition and age dating of groundwater are highlighted. Studies of other groundwater quality characteristics are underway but ﬁndings are not included in this article. Mineral Composition of Groundwater Figure 3 is a “Stiff Diagram” depicting the mineral composition of groundwater detected in four different aquifer intervals from a monitoring well west of the Sacramento River in Glenn County.
4 1 2 3 in mineral composition of groundwater A Stiff Diagram is one graphical method of displaying the types and sampled from a quadruple-completion concentrations of the major cations and anions in the groundwater. monitoring well . The types and concentrations of cations are plotted on the left axes and anions are plotted on the right axes. The green polygon(#1) depicts the general mineral composition associated with the shallow alluvial groundwater from about 30 to 100 feet below the ground surface. The orange polygon (#2) represents the groundwater mineral composition associated with the Tehama Formation from about 170 to 280 feet below ground surface. The upper blue polygon (#3) represents groundwater from a deeper portion of the Tehama Aquifer between 400 and 510 feet. The lower blue polygon (#4) is from a highly conﬁned portion of a deep aquifer from 920 to 1000 feet. Field analysis of lithologic samples to determine the geologic formation associated with this deep aquifer was inconclusive. Detailed analysis of the sand grains within this aquifer is being conducted to more accurately identify the associated geologic formation. Figure 3. Stiff diagram showing the vertical change At this dedicated monitoring well, the mineral composition of groundwater in the northern Sacramento is relatively low in total dissolved cations and anions in all four discrete groundwater zones. The sum of the cations (Ca, Mg, and Na) and anions (HCO3, CO3, Cl, and SO4) each total to about 5.0 meq/l (milliequivalents per liter), and poses very little if any limitation for use as a domestic, industrial, or irrigation supply. However, the mineral composition of the groundwater does vary with depth as illustrated by differently shaped polygons in Figure 3. The mineral composition of groundwater from the upper two zones (polygons 1 and 2) show balanced proportions of calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sodium cations and a predominance of bicarbonate and carbonate anions. In contrast, the mineral composition in the deeper groundwater (polygons 3 and 4) shows a predominance of sodium (Na) and lower levels of calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg), while bicarbonate and carbonate anions remain predominant. In terms of assessing suitability, Sodium (Na) dominated waters tend to have less hardness associated with them, which may have beneﬁts to some domestic and industrial uses but sodium dominated waters in other parts of California have been shown to contribute to reduced soil tilth and slower water inﬁltration characteristics when used for irrigation. Aside from assessing groundwater suitability for use, the Stiff Diagram in Figure 3 depicts the mineral composition of groundwater from discrete aquifer zones that can serve as a baseline to monitor change. When Stiff Diagrams are developed to characterize the mineral composition of groundwater sampled from numerous dedicated groundwater monitoring wells throughout the northern Sacramento Valley (Figure 4), unique differences and correlations in mineral composition of groundwater can help provide a better understanding of the extent of the aquifer systems beneath the Sacramento Valley. Using Isotopes to “Age” Groundwater Below, Figure 5 shows the sample locations and the estimated age for groundwater sampled from the Tehama and lower Tuscan Formations at different sites in the north valley. The range of age dating accuracy varies signiﬁcantly depending upon the analysis method. The age results reported for “modern” water (<100 yrs. old) can be accurate within a couple of years. The age results associated with “pre-modern” water (100 – 9000 yrs old) may only be accurate to within a couple thousand years; while the “paleo” water (>10,000 yrs old), is only accurate in the range of tens of thousands of years. Test results in Figure 5 indicate that the “age” of the groundwater samples ranges Figure 4. Stiff diagrams showing the spatial distribution and from less than 100 years to tens of thousands of years. In general, mineral composition of groundwater in the northern Sacramento Valley sampled from multi-completion the more shallow wells in the lower Tuscan Formation along the monitoring wells. eastern margin of the valley have the “youngest” water and the deeper wells in the western and southern portions of the valley have the “oldest” water. The youngest groundwater in the lower Tuscan Formation is probably nearest to recharge areas. Samples of groundwater from the Tehama Formation ranged from less than 100 years to about 3000 years old. GROUNDWATER INFORMATIONAL SERIES Some of the past articles in this series are listed below and are available at http://cetehama.ucdavis.edu:
1. Incentives for groundwater management in the Sacramento Valley, July 2003 2. Possible approaches to groundwater management in the Northern Sacramento Valley, October 2003 3. Groundwater level monitoring. What is it? How is it done? Why do it? January 2004 4. Seeking an understanding of the groundwater aquifer systems in the Northern Sacramento Valley: An Update, September, 2005 5. Land subsidence: What is it? Why is it an important aspect of groundwater management? June 2006 6. Monitoring groundwater quality: An important aspect of groundwater management, September 2006 7. Working to understand groundwater quality in the northern Sacramento Valley, June 2007 Figure 5. Sample locations and estimated age of the groundwater at various monitoring sites in the north valley. Age is estimated in years; dark blue values represent groundwater in lower Tuscan Formation and red values represent groundwater in Tehama Formation. The University of California prohibits discrimination against or harassment of any person employed by or seeking employment with the University on the basis of race, color, nation origin, religion, sex, physical or mental disability, medical condition (cancer-related or genetic characteristics), ancestry, marital status, age, sexual orientation, citizenship, or status as a covered veteran (special disabled veteran, Vietnam-era veteran or any other veteran who served on active duty during a war or in a campaign or expedition for which a campaign badge has been authorized). University Policy is intended to be consistent with the prevision of applicable State and Federal laws. Inquiries regarding the University's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to the Affirmative Action/Staff Personnel Services Director, University of California, Agriculture and Natural resources, 1111 Franklin, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94607-5200, Phone (510) 987-0096. This article is the last in a series of five to be published in 2006/07 discussing topics related to groundwater and water wells in the northern Sacramento Valley. Article No. 5 – June 2007 WORKING TO UNDERSTAND GROUNDWATER QUALITY IN THE NORTHERN SACRAMENTO VALLEY Allan Fulton UCCE Farm Advisor Tehama, Glenn, Colusa, and Shasta Counties This Outreach is funded by the “Four County Drinking Water Quality Program” – Butte, Glenn, Tehama, and Colusa Counties Permit #112 Red Bluff, CA Non-Profit Organization U.S. Postage PAID ...
View Full Document
- Three '09