CRT 205 Week 7 CheckPoint 1 Argument Validity

CRT 205 Week 7 CheckPoint 1 Argument Validity - Week 7:...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Week 7: CheckPoint 1: Argument Validity 2. The premise that past events guarantees future events is fallacious. Although there is an average amount of rainfall in California, the average does not represent an actual yearly amount of rainfall, but only the sum of the inches over a given number of years divided by that number of years. Therefore the prediction for 23 inches of rain is quite weak, and can only be considered possibly true or possibly false. 3. The premises of the argument are that the vehicle is old, has a 'monster V8', and needs an overhaul. Each of these conditions does make it likely true that the vehicle will not achieve 40 miles per gallon. However, we do not know everything about the car; the speaker does not even divulge the make or model of vehicle, so it is possible that it might have been a uniquely fuel efficient model, or have been modified to be more fuel efficient. Therefore the conclusion is probably true , but not absolutely true. 4. The premise that past events guarantees future results is fallacious. Specifically, the premise that a victory in the Iowa Republican primary precludes a candidate from winning the party nomination, based on three out of four years of history, is worth considering, but does not absolutely guarantee history will repeat itself. However, it is true that there is a momentum to
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

CRT 205 Week 7 CheckPoint 1 Argument Validity - Week 7:...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online