The politics of John Rawls

The politics of John Rawls - T he politics of John Rawls...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The politics of John Rawls This is a political summary of the defects of John Rawls' contractarian liberalism. Rawls Theory of Justice (1971) is the most influential normative work of political philosophy of the last two generations. In 1993 it was followed by a broader work on Political Liberalism. Rawls later work claims that his concerns are not metaphysical, but political: a stable and workable society in the western liberal tradition. In reality, all his work is a justification of liberal societies against others. Worse, it is a justification of the inequality and injustice in those societies, and a model for a conservative future. Rawls died on 24 November 2002. Last update 11 January 2003. Objections to the Theory of Justice The form of social contract described by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice can be called the 'fictive assembly' type. In another 1970's version, by Bruce Ackerman, the assembly is more explicit - the inhabitants of a planet draw up a social contract on a spaceship ( Social justice in the Liberal State New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980). In both cases, the social contract is the contract which would be confirmed by the entire population, under ideal conditions, after perfect and complete consideration. All contractarian theory rests on the principle of "as if", the contract is never real. Each contractarian theorist has a different "as if", and a different claimed contract. Rawls does not use the word 'assembly', but it is implicit in his model. Natural persons are removed from their real physical existence, and converted into rational beings who can debate, discuss, agree and contract. (Rawls ultimately choose heads of households as the 'persons', a choice criticised by feminists). The non- physical beings agree a social contract - for Rawls that is essentially his minimum principles of justice. Then they 'go back to earth', become real persons, and live in a society where these principles apply. Rawls' innovation in the fictive assembly model is that the participants don't know who they will be, when they come back to earth. They might be a powerful emperor, they might be a slave, so the debate should take account of both possibilities. This is the 'veil of ignorance', which apparently no contractarian had thought of before. Rawls assumes it will improve his model. This whole approach is flawed, even if you accept the idea of a fictive social contract, entered into by fictive rational agents. To be exact, it includes morally arbitrary choices, which are concealed by Rawls style. First, there is only one assembly. Why only one? There is only one social contract. Why not different (multiple) versions? There is an assumption of non-migration: if there were multiple social contracts, then some people could live under different versions, in the course of their lives. If there were multiple contracts and migration, then the migration can be voluntary. This introduces the element of real- life voluntarism into contractarianism. Rawls simply prohibits voluntarism - by means of the specific
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
construction he has chosen. But he does not make that choice explicit, and makes no attempt to
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/22/2010 for the course POLI 4081 taught by Professor Jr,j during the Spring '08 term at LSU.

Page1 / 28

The politics of John Rawls - T he politics of John Rawls...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online