CRT205 WK7 Assignment

CRT205 WK7 Assignment - Read the article Controlling...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Read the article “ Controlling Irrational Fears 9/11” on pp. 456-458 of appendix 1. Identify at least two arguments in the article. Outline the premises and conclusions of each argument you find. Then, answer the following questions for each argument, making sure to explain how you arrived at your answers. Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions? Are the arguments either deductively valid or inductively strong, or are they invalid or weak? Are the premises true or plausible true, or are they difficult to prove? Note that you may choose to evaluate invalid or weak arguments as long as you describe how they are invalid or weak. 1). First argument: The comparison between automobile accidents in America and what happened on the attack of 9/11. Premise: In the reading Appendix 1 of this week, the author refers of the attack of September 11, as a tragic event that caused the Americans to be more susceptible to react with rage, especially if this happened closer to their homes. Premise: Another point mentioned in this argument is the recommendation to all the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/25/2010 for the course AXIA Axia taught by Professor Na during the Spring '09 term at Phoenix School of Law.

Page1 / 2

CRT205 WK7 Assignment - Read the article Controlling...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online