Development and Chronological Changes

Development and Chronological Changes - The Development of...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: The Development of the Temple Temple of Karnak1 The Karnak temple complex experienced more than 1,500 years of construction, destruction, renovation, and modification, resulting in the creation of a confusing web of buildings and courts attributed to a variety of different kings. The patronage of major state building projects was almost exclusively the right of the ruler, and his (and in one case, her) name conspicuously adorns most monuments at Karnak. In a few rare cases, important cult personnel, such as the high priest of Amun or the god s wife of Amun, gained so much power or prestige that they too sponsored the erection or decoration of buildings within the precinct. But this was unusual, and the development of the temple over time can most easily be understood as linked closely with the succession of national rulers. The following essay is split into two sections. Section I lists the structures added (+) and removed (-) by each king, with a brief description of the architecture of new or renovated buildings. Only limited explanation is provided. Section II offers more in-depth information on the development of the temple, including discussions of the significance of the changes and the evidence for the reconstructions. Karnak as it exists today. I. Phase-by-Phase Summary of Temple Growth and Change Karnak Temple in the Middle Kingdom Senusret I (Kheperkara) 1971-1926 (+) Senusret I built a limestone temple, pierced by four doorways with red granite thresholds. It was fronted by an impressive portico of square pillars with statues of the king in the pose of the god Osiris. One reconstruction of the building suggests it had a rectangular, open peristyle court, leading to a series of inner chambers via a central axis. The sanctuary of the god lay off this axis, and could only be reached by making a ninety-degree turn to the left from the central line of rooms.2 A calcite ( Egyptian alabaster ) altar, found at Karnak reused in a different location, stood inside the room and held a shrine for the statue of AmunRa.3 Model rendering of Karnak in the reign of Senusret I. 1 This narrative is based on the author’s submission on the topic to the online UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology (UEE). Some sections have been directly excerpted from that publication. Gabolde 1998: 18-21 Lauffray 1979: 124; Ullmann 2007: 2 3 The Development of the Temple of Karnak (+) The king s famous limestone white chapel was a square-shaped structure raised on a short platform. Its pillars were decorated with finely carved scenes of the king interacting with Amun-Ra and other gods. The chapel probably stood outside the main temple, possibly along a north/south processional route.4 (+) A rectangular mud brick wall encircled the Middle Kingdom temple of Senusret I, and the precinct can be imagined to have extended west at least to the position of the present fourth pylon.5 Karnak Temple in the Early 18th Dynasty Amenhotep I (Djeserkara) 1525-1504 (+) Along the Middle Kingdom forecourt s north and south sides, Amenhotep I put up two lines of stone chapels and storage rooms. (+) A calcite ( Egyptian alabaster ) bark chapel was added to the forecourt of the temple, bounded by two large protecting walls. (+) The king also added a line of small chapels that possibly divided the forecourt into western and eastern halves. (+/-) The mud brick wall and door to the Middle Kingdom forecourt were removed and replaced by a high wall and gate with a double columned portico. (+) At the temple s main western door, a new large gate or pylon was erected. (+/-) The brick enclosure wall surrounding the north, east, and south walls of the Senusret I temple was torn down and replaced with a limestone enclosure.6 (+) Amenhotep s second bark shrine, an exact copy of Senusret I s limestone white chapel, was added to the temple. It, like the white chapel, probably remained outside the temple s western gate.7 Thutmose I (Aakheperkara) 1504-1492 (+/-) The fourth and fifth pylons were added, as well as their corresponding stone enclosure walls, which still form the core area of the temple.8 The construction of the fourth pylon must have necessitated the removal of the earlier feature of Amenhotep I on the same location. (+) Thutmose began construction on a new hall between the fourth and fifth pylons. This was built in two phases: in the first phase, a line of rectangular niches was inserted in the east wall of the fourth pylon for the placement of statues of the king in the pose of the god Osiris. In the second phase, a second group of larger Osiride statues were placed lining the wall between the niches. Fluted Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 2 A model rendering of Karnak in the reign of Amenhotep I. The white chapel of Senusret I. The Amenhotep I calcite chapel which originally stood in the Middle Kingdom court. 4 5 6 7 8 Lacau and Chevrier 1956 Gabolde 1998; Charloux 2007: pl. IV Graindorge 2002 Björkman 1971: 58 Björkman 1971: 61 The Development of the Temple of Karnak sandstone columns with inscriptions of the king were added to the four sides of the hall, forming a covered peristyle to protect the exposed statuary.9 (+) Two red granite obelisks were raised in front of the fourth pylon, the temple s main western entrance at the time. Only the central inscriptions on this obelisk are original to the king, the slightly smaller later inscriptions, carved by Ramesses IV and VI, flank his on all four sides of the monument.10 Thutmose II (Aakheperenra) 1492-1479 (+/-) Another new pylon was added to the temple, this one placed west of the fourth pylon, enclosing the obelisks of Thutmose I and creating a deep festival hall of the king. Walls along the hall s north and south sides connected the new pylon to the fourth, and a small pylon entrance led out of the hall on its south. The pylon was later removed, so it does not figure into the numbering system of the temple.11 Hatshepsut (Maatkara), Queen 1473-1458 (+/-) The queen extensively renovated the hall of Thutmose I between the fourth and fifth pylons. She removed his stone columns, replacing them with five gilded-wood papyriform wadj columns, giving the hall its name: Wadjet. The northern and southern areas of the hall were roofed with wooden ceilings supported by these columns.12 (+) Two red granite obelisks were erected within the Wadjet hall. The obelisks were covered with small scenes of the queen (depicted as a male pharaoh) making offerings to the gods.13 (+) The queen erected a pair of red granite obelisks commissioned by her late husband, Thutmose II. The 27-28 meter tall monoliths were almost surely placed in his festival hall, west of the pair of Thutmose I.14 (+/-) Hatshepsut may have disassembled the Osiris portico of the Middle Kingdom temple. According to one scholar s reconstruction, she appended a suite of rooms called the palace of Ma at to the front of the remaining structure.15 (-) The queen removed the bark shrine, chapels, and gateway of Amenhotep I to make room for her new palace. (+) Within or somewhere in front of the palace, she placed a beautiful tworoomed bark chapel of rose quartzite and black granite, the red chapel. 16 (+) In east Karnak, Hatshepsut placed another pair of obelisks outside the Thutmose I stone enclosure walls.17 A model rendering of Karnak in the reign of Hatshepsut. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Carlotti and Gabolde 2003: 284-286 Habachi and Van Siclen 1977: 57-59 Gabolde 1993 Carlotti and Gabolde 2003: 289-291 Habachi and Van Siclen 1977: 60-63, 68 Gabolde 1987: 149-150 and pl. II Gabolde 1998, 1999. Lacau and Chevrier 1977: 23-25; Larché and Burgos 2006 Habachi and Van Siclen 1977: 60-63, 68 A model rendering of Karnak in the reign of Thutmose I. A model rendering of the Thutmose II “Festival Court” and pylon. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 3 The Development of the Temple of Karnak (+) A new sandstone pylon, the eighth, was built to the south of the temple, along what appears to have been the previously established north/south temple processional route. Thutmose III (Menkheperra) 1479-1425 (+) One of the king s greatest changes to Karnak was the addition of a huge temple, called the Akhmenu, placed behind Karnak s then eastern wall. The structure had a large pillared hall with beautifully painted columns carved in the shape of tent poles. Its ceiling was covered in yellow painted stars on a blue ground. In one of the rear rooms, relief scenes depicted the many species of flora and fauna sighted by the king and his men during their foreign military campaigns. (+) A new sandstone enclosure wall was constructed, encircling the Akhmenu within the sacred space of the greater temple precinct. The new enclosure created a long entrance hallway to the Akhmenu s southwestern door. (+) On the east wall of the new enclosure, Thutmose added a small contra-temple. It was bordered on each side by the obelisks of Hatshepsut. These shrines, usually appended to the rear wall of a temple and opening outward, provided a location for those not allowed to enter the temple proper to interact with the divinities. Often statues of the king were located at the contra-temple, and regular people would petition the images to act as intermediaries with the gods on their behalf. The example at Karnak held a large alabaster naos with a statue of the king and the god Amun.18 (+) Between Hatshepsut s pylon (the eighth) and the temple, Thutmose erected another pylon, the seventh. He adorned its south side with two red granite obelisks.19 (+/-) Along the southern processional route formed by the seventh and eighth pylons, the king added a calcite bark shrine surrounded by square pillars. This may have replaced an earlier calcite shrine of Amenhotep I on the same location (placed there by Hatshepsut during her renovations of the core of the temple), as Thutmose III gave his shrine an identical name.20 (+) South of the Middle Kingdom court, Thutmose ordered the digging of a large sacred lake. (+) To the east of the lake, the king added a large mud brick enclosure wall with exterior bastions. The extent of the wall at this time period, both to the north and the south, has not yet been determined. (+/-) Renovations of the Wadjet hall continued. Possibly due to damage incurred from heavy rainstorms, Thutmose III determined to completely roof the space. A Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 4 18 19 20 Brand 2007: 60-61; Varille 1950: 23 Habachi and Van Siclen 1977: 60-63, 68 Björkman 1971: 58; Blyth 2006: 35-36 The contra temple at Karnak as it exists today. A model rendering of Karnak from the later part of Thutmose III’s reign. The Development of the Temple of Karnak stone gateway was erected around the obelisks of Hatshepsut, completely encapsulating their lower portions. The queen s wooden wadj columns were removed for replacement with six sandstone columns in the north half of the hall, eight in the south. The interior walls of the court were covered with a skin of stone, obscuring the original statue recesses of Thutmose I. Before his death, it appears that the king only had time to roof the northern part of the hall with sandstone slabs, supported by his network of pillars, court walls, and the new gateway. Amenhotep II, the next pharaoh, finished the work21 (although the entire roof is added to the model under Thutmose III). (+) The sixth pylon was erected in the area in front of the palace of Ma at, and a small, pillared court created to both its sides. (+) Along the sides of these reworked courts, he replaced the limestone chapels of Amenhotep I with sandstone replicas.22 (+) Walls were appended to the east faces of the fifth and sixth pylons, creating a corridor along the temple s central axis to the palace of Ma at. (-) Hatshepsut s red chapel was removed and dismantled, with the front and rear doors reused in an interior wall of the palace s suite of rooms and the new corridor behind the sixth pylon.23 (+) The red chapel was replaced with a new granite shrine, of similar size and shape, and a new entrance portico was designed for the palace of Ma at. 24 (+) The king raised his own pair of granite obelisks between those of Thutmose I and Thutmose II in the festival hall before the fourth pylon.25 A model rendering of Pylon VII with actual reliefs from Karnak. Karnak Temple in the Mid 18th Dynasty Amenhotep II (Aakheperura) 1427-1401 (+) Amenhotep II finished the construction on the southern section of Thutmose III s Wadjet hall, adding and decorating the southern eight pillars and its roof (shown during the reign of Thutmose III on the model). (+) To the east of this hall, along the narrow corridor leading to the Akhmenu, the king may have added small structure with a central shrine and surrounding square piers. This likely functioned as a station of the king, a place for the king or sacred bark to pause during festival journeys.26 (+) A small calcite chapel, decorated with sunk relief, was placed within the festival hall. This seems to have stood wedged between the two obelisks of Thutmose I in that court. Its single doorway faced east.27 The reconstruction in the Open Air Museum of the Amenhotep II shrine, originally located between the eastern pair of obelisks in the Thutmose II Festival Court. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 5 Carlotti and Gabolde 2003: 293-295 Björkman 1971: 77-78 Björkman 1971: 77-78; Dorman 1988: 54-65 Carlotti 1995a; Dorman 1988: 56-65 Gabolde 1987: 151 and pl. II Van Siclen 2005a: 39-41 and figs. 14-15 Larché 2007: 477-480 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Thutmose IV (Menkheperura) 1401-1391 (+) King Thutmose IV added a vividly painted sandstone double peristyle to the court of the fourth pylon.28 (+) The king placed a calcite ( Egyptian alabaster ) bark shrine, quite similar to the calcite shrine of Amenhotep I, within the festival hall. 29 (+) On the east side of Karnak, he raised a giant red granite obelisk, originally quarried by Thutmose III. He added lines of inscriptions around those of his grandfather (the central inscription) and raised it in the area of Karnak particularly focused on the worship of the sun. Unlike all the other obelisks at Karnak, this was intentionally placed alone.30 Amenhotep III (Nebmaatra) 1390-1352 (-) The king s most drastic change at Karnak consisted of tearing down the pylon erected by Thutmose II. (-) He also destroyed most of the festival hall west of the fourth pylon, removing the western half of Thutmose IV s peristyle and his calcite bark shrine, the limestone white chapel of Senusret I, the calcite chapel of Amenhotep I, and the loose blocks of the red chapel of Hatshepsut. (+) All these removed structures were then used as building material for the construction of a new pylon, the third, slightly east of the destroyed pylon of Thutmose II.31 (+) Amenhotep III also began construction on another pylon, the tenth, extending the southern processional route towards the Mut Temple. With only a few courses completed on the pylon, the king must have died, as construction halted and was not to be resumed again until the reign of Horemheb.32 Above: a model rendering of Karnak in the reign of Amenhotep III. Below: a model rendering of the Gempa-Aten which no longer exists today. The reconstruction of the Thutmose IV peristyle hall from the Thutmose II “Festival Court” in the Open Air Museum. Karnak Temple in the Late 18th Dynasty Amenhotep IV / Akhenaten (Neferkheperura Waenra) 1352-1336 (+) A vestibule was appended to the front of the third pylon and decorated in the beginning of Amenhotep IV s reign.33 28 (+) In east Karnak, a huge temple called Gem-pa-Aten was built using small, easily portable sandstone ( talatat ) blocks.34 The western part of the building formed a rectangular open court lined by a covered colonnade with square piers.35 Huge androgynous statues of the king and his wife, queen Nefertiti, stood against each column.36 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 6 Bryan 1980: 222-224; Letellier 1979, 1991 Bryan 1980: 228 Bell 2002: 23-25; Habachi and Van Siclen 1977: 112-114 Lauffray 1979: 49 Azim 1982 Sa’ad 1970 Redford 1984: 63 Redford 1984: 102-105 Arnold, Dorothea 1996: 18-19 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Tutankhamen (Nebkheperura) 1336-1327 (+) The boy king ordered that a series of ram-headed sphinx statues be placed along the processional route from the Amun precinct s southern gate to the temple of Mut (not shown on the model, but visible on the maps).37 Horemheb (Djeserkheperura) 1323-1295 (-) Horemheb commanded the tearing down of Akhenaten s Karnak structures. The Gem-pa-Aten temple was demolished block-by-block and used as building fill for his new constructions at Karnak.38 (+) The ninth pylon, situated along the southern processional route, was added. (+) Construction on the tenth pylon, abandoned unfinished by Amenhotep III, was completed. (+/-) Between the king s new ninth and tenth pylons, a building with a pillared façade was erected atop a low platform. This building, the edifice of Amenhotep II, was composed of blocks reused from a series of structures in an earlier court along the southern processional. The buildings and the court belonged to Amenhotep II, all of whose constructions in the area were swept away for Horemheb s additions.39 (+) A new western entrance to the temple was added, the second pylon.40 A model rendering of Karnak in the reign of Horemheb. Karnak Temple in the 19th Dynasty Ramesses I (Menpehtyra) 1295-1294 (+) A small station of the king, a kiosk in which the king could stand during cult rituals within the temple, was appended to the second pylon during the king s short reign.41 Sety I (Menmaatra) 1294-1279 (+) Sety constructed a massive hypostyle hall between the third and second pylons. Twelve sandstone columns in the shape of open papyrus plants, each 21 meters (70 ft) high, supported a raised central hall. The bordering side aisles were forested with 122 papyrus bud columns, each 12 meters (40 ft) tall. The central nave was lined with stone grills that allowed light to filter into the hall.42 Pylon II with the hypostyle hall behind it. 37 38 39 40 41 42 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 7 Cabrol 2001; Murnane and EatonKrauss 1991 Redford 1984: 228 Lauffray 1979: 143; Van Siclen 2005a: 42 Azim 1982; Lauffray 1979: 111, 147 Van Siclen 1986: 41-42 Brand 2004 The Development of the Temple of Karnak (+/-) The western wall of the third pylon was covered over as part of the construction of the new hypostyle hall. Renovations were made to the vestibule as well, covering the unfinished Akhenaten scenes. (+) On the north exterior wall of the hall, the king s battles against numerous foreign foes were memorialized in a series of monumental relief scenes. These show Sety I triumphing over people from Syria, Libya, and Nubia, among others. As the conquering pharaoh, the king dwarfs all the other figures in the relief, and he is instantly recognizable within his chariot or smiting his foes.43 Ramesses II (Usermaatra Setepenra) 1279-1213 (+) In the eastern section of Karnak, Ramesses II added a small shrine before the single obelisk of Thutmose IV. The shrine, called the temple of Amun-Ra, Ramesses, who-hears-prayers, consisted of a gateway and pillared hall with a central false door. Two lateral doors led to the object of veneration, the unique obelisk.44 Like the contra-temple of Thutmose III, this shrine offered a place for regular people to approach and petition the divine image to act as an intermediary with the gods.45 (+) The king also added an entrance to eastern Karnak, marked by two red granite obelisks and a pair of sphinxes.46 (+) Ramesses II finished the decoration of the interior of the hypostyle hall, left incomplete by Sety I. (+) On the hall s south exterior wall the king added his own series of monumental battle scene reliefs. Sety II (Userkheperura Setepenra) 1200-1194 (+) West of the new temple entrance at the second pylon, Sety erected a small triple shrine of quartzite and sandstone. Its three sanctuary rooms were dedicated to Amun, Mut, and Khonsu, and the portable boats of these gods would have paused here during festival journeys before crossing the Nile.47 A model rendering of Karnak in the reign of Ramesses II. A model rendering of the hypostyle hall, showing how much darker the hall originally would have been when it had a roof. Karnak Temple in the 20th Dynasty Ramesses III (Usermaatra Meryamen) 1184-1153 (+) Ramesses III added his own bark shrine to the temple s western entrance, opposite that of Sety II. This shrine took the shape and size of a small temple and included a small pylon, a court with colossal statue pillars of the king, a small hypostyle hall, and a sanctuary.48 43 44 45 46 47 48 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 8 Schwaller de Lubicz 1999: 553-562; Survey 1986 Barguet 1962: 52-53 Bell 2002: 17; Brand 2007: 60-61 Barguet 1962: 223-224; Bell 2002: 23; Cabrol 2001: 186 Chevrier 1940; Legrain 1929: 75-83 Legrain 1929: 85-123; Survey 1936 The Development of the Temple of Karnak (+) To the southwest, Ramesses III began work on a new a temple to the child-god Khonsu. The temple contained not only a suite of rooms for the housing of the statue of the god, but also a separate bark chamber. The Khonsu temple faced south, paralleling the southern processional route of the Amun temple, and it too would have had its own pathway in that direction.49 Ramesses IX (Neferkara Setepenra) 1126-1108 (+) The king placed a monumental inscribed gateway on the door to the southern processional route between the third and fourth pylons.50 Karnak Temple in the Third Intermediate Period (Dynasties 21-25) High Priest of Amun Pinedjem 1054-1039 (+) On the western side of Karnak, he usurped and positioned a second group of ram-headed sphinxes (also possibly removed from another temple) before the second pylon.51 The exact arrangement and length of the statue-lined path is unknown, but they likely extended up to or past the area of the later first pylon to a quay. (+) A powerful high priest of Amun during the 21st Dynasty named Pinedjem moved pairs of ram-headed sphinxes (likely taken from a temple of Amenhotep III somewhere in Thebes) to the processional way of the Khonsu temple (not shown on the model).52 Shoshenq I (Hedjkheperra Setepenra) 945-924 (+) Before the second pylon of Horemheb, Shoshenq constructed a huge court encompassing the Sety II shrine and the front section of the Ramesses III shrine. The court was lined on its north and south walls by a colonnade of sandstone columns with papyrus bud capitals.53 On its western side, an entrance with a monumental central gate would have fronted the court. It was later destroyed by the construction of the first pylon of Nectanebo I, but the unfinished stone gate of the first pylon may originally have come from this earlier entrance.54 (+/-) The arrangement of the new court likely necessitated the shuffling of the sphinx statues in the area,55 with some possibly moved to outside the new court. (+) The side door to the southeast corner of the court (the Bubastite portal ) was covered with scenes and inscriptions describing the king s military campaigns in Palestine. The king, the largest figure in the composition, strides forward in the act of smiting his enemies. To the left stands the god Amun and the goddess of Thebes (smaller and below Amun), both of whom grasp cords binding the hands Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 9 A model rendering of Karnak during the reign of Shoshenq I. The Khonsu temple of Ramesses III as it is today. A model rendering of Karnak during the reign of the High Priest of Amun Pinedjem. 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 25-30 Amer 1999 Cabrol 1995: 25-27, 2001: 206-208 Cabrol 2001: 26-27, 239-255; Porter and Moss 1927: 77-79 Legrain 1929: 45-50 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 35-36 Cabrol 2001: 209 The Development of the Temple of Karnak and throats of a string of captives. These symbolic figures each correspond to one of the many towns and tribes Shoshenq claimed to have conquered. Their names are written in hieroglyphs within an oval mimicking the form of a crenellated city wall. The relief scenes are a very important historical document, as an account of the king s incursions into the area is also included in the Hebrew Bible (I Kings 14:25, II Chronicles 12:2).56 Taharqo (Khunefertemra) 690-664 (+) An entrance porch formed by twenty stone papyrus columns was appended onto the front of the temple of Khonsu. (+) A second, similarly designed entrance porch was added to the temple of Ramesses II ( Amun-Ra-who-hears-prayers ) in east Karnak.57 Low intercolumnar walls connecting the east/west rows were covered with scenes of the king presenting offerings to Amun-Ra and other deities.58 (+) In Shoshenq s new court, Taharqo placed a giant free-standing kiosk before the second pylon. It was formed of two rows of five papyrus columns (each some 21 meters tall), topped by square abaci. Scholars generally agree that the width of the kiosk (over 16 meters) could not have been bridged with a roof, and the structure was therefore left uncovered. It is possible, however, that its sides were connected by architraves.59 (+/-) It may have been because of the construction of this kiosk (or earlier, when the first court was constructed by Shoshenq I), that the sphinx statues were moved to line the sides of the first court. (+) Next to the temple s sacred lake Taharqo added another structure, his edifice of the lake. The sandstone building s first floor consisted of a number of subterranean rooms, while its upper portion, now destroyed, possibly contained an open-air court. A mud brick courtyard fronted the building on its east side, cut through by a deep stone well. Often labeled a Nilometer (a place to measure the height of the Nile s inundation), it seems instead to have functioned as a well to reach the mythical primeval waters imagined to still flow beneath the ground.60 A model rendering of Karnak from the reign of Taharqo. The “Bubastite portal”. Karnak in the Late Period (Dynasties 26 to 30) Psammuthis (Userra Setepenptah) 393 (+) Psammuthis sponsored the construction of a new storehouse and aviary located south of Karnak s sacred lake. The mud brick and stone building contained ramps for the sacred birds to access the lake, as well as areas for animal butchery. Inscriptions on building describe it as a shena-wab, a place for the preparation of the god s daily meals.61 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 10 The “edifice of Taharqo” near the sacred lake also included a “Nilometer.” 56 57 58 59 60 61 Survey 1954: vii-viii, pls. 2-9 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 57, 282; Leclant 1965: 56-57, 84 Leclant 1953 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 51; Lauffray 1970, 1975, 1979: 102-107 Parker, Leclant and Goyon 1979 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 101-102; Traunecker 1987 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Hakoris (Khnemmaatra) 393-380 (+) Hakoris added a small chapel outside of the temple s first pylon for the entrance and exit of the god s bark from the Nile. The chapel, a type of turning station, possessed an extra wide western door so that the god s bark could be removed from the river with its bow and stern parallel to the banks and brought directly inside. The bark would be rested on the altar inside, then removed and taken to the temple gate via a narrower northern door, all without shifting its direction.62 Nectanebo I (Kheperkara) 380-362 (+) The Amun temple was enclosed with new massive precinct walls, significantly reorganizing the sacred space. The precinct wall, shaped like a huge trapezoid and standing over 20 meters high, encircled the Amun temple at the first court in the west, the small temple of Ptah in the north, the obelisks of Ramesses II in the east, and the tenth pylon in the south. Extra space was given in the southwest corner to include a temple of Opet (discussed below).63 (+/-) Nectanebo restructured the entrance to the temple in front of the Shoshenq I court. After removing the walls along the court s west side, he began the construction of two huge sandstone towers, the first pylon. This massive pylon, the largest ever built in ancient Egypt, measures more than 110 meters long and over 15 meters thick. Left unfinished, its height would have extended 38 to 40 meters. The huge unfinished stone gateway of Shoshenq was retained, and if it too had been completed, it would have stretched over 27 meters tall.64 (+) The king began (or resumed) construction on a temple dedicated to the goddess Opet. Located perpendicularly to the temple of Khonsu, its small hypostyle and sanctuary area were raised on a platform two meters above the level of its forecourts. Hidden within the interior walls and floor were a number of small crypts for the storage of valuable cult equipment. One of these, extending under ground level, was envisioned as a tomb of Osiris. Low on the temple s rear wall, a small chamber dedicated to Osiris opened out onto a side entrance into the Khonsu temple.65 (+) The entire two-kilometer processional route between Karnak and Luxor Temple was lined with approximately 700 sandstone human-headed sphinxes (not shown on the model, but displayed on many of the maps).66 (+) Along the sides of the contra temple of Thutmoses III, Nectanebo I added two small chapels covered with relief scenes.67 One of the sphinxes recently excavated on the road between Karnak and Luxor Temple. A model rendering of Karnak in the reign of Hakoris. A model rendering of Karnak in the reign of Nectanebo I. 62 63 64 65 66 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 11 67 Lauffray 1995a: 22-23, 59 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 115-118 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 35-36, 118; Carlotti 1995b: pl. XVII Arnold, Dieter 1999: 118, 197; Lauffray 1979: 218; Wilkinson 2000: 162 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 118; Cabrol 2001: 283-287 Varille 1950: 137, 158-160 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Karnak in the Greco-Roman Period Philip Arrhidaeus (Macedonian): 323-316 (+/-) The red granite bark shrine of Thutmose III, situated in the heart of Karnak within the palace of Ma at, was replaced with a granite replica of similar size and shape. The new shrine was inscribed with scenes depicting Philip Arrhidaeus (the brother of Macedonian conqueror Alexander the Great ) as pharaoh.68 Ptolemy III Euergetes I 246-221 (+) The king modified the entrance to the Khonsu temple. Between two planned stone pylon towers (only the foundations were completed), he placed a huge stone gate, known today by its Arabic name Bab el-Amara. The portal was covered with inscribed relief scenes and texts of that king.69 Ptolemy IV Philopator 221-205 (+) In the precinct s northeast corner, Ptolemy IV sponsored the construction of an Osiris catacomb. Composed of three vaulted mud brick corridors with painted plaster decoration, the structure included hundreds of small niches along its aisles. While labyrinthine Egyptian catacombs usually contained burials of sacred animals, the structure instead was intended for the placement of statuettes of Osiris.70 Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II (Physkon) 170-163 and 145-116 (+/-) The eastern temple of Amun-Ra-who-hears-prayers was modified. The central false door of Ramesses II was removed, and a third door created in the western side of the pillared forecourt. Walls were added around the covered colonnade, enclosing the western area of the chapel and the lower portion of the unique obelisk.71 (+) The king completed construction (possibly begun by Nectanebo I) on a temple dedicated to the goddess Opet.72 End of Ptolemaic Period (+/-) Sometime before the end of the Ptolemaic rule, the unfinished pylon foundations for the entrance to the Khonsu temple were covered over with a brick wall that met up with the new gate.73 Roman era 30 BCE-395AD (+/-) A major reorganization of the western entranceway to the temple took place during the Roman period. The sphinxes before the first pylon were rearranged and placed in their present location.74 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 12 The central bark shrine from the reign of Philip Arrhidaeus. Above: a model rendering showing the interior of the “Osiris catacombs”, now almost completely destroyed. Below: a model rendering of Karnak in the reign of Ptolemy VIII. 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 131; Barguet 1962: 136-141 Lauffray, Sa’ad and Sauneron 1975: 26 Leclére 1996, 2002; Leclére and Coulon 1998 Barguet 1962: 228-240 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 118, 197; Lauffray 1979: 218; Wilkinson 2000: 162 Laroche-Traunecker 1982: 329 Lauffray 1971 The Development of the Temple of Karnak II. Discussion of Architectural Change at Karnak Our current understanding of how and why the temple grew and changed relies mainly on the archaeological work undertaken at Karnak in the 20th century, as well as recent work since the year 2000. Over time, the larger picture of the temple precinct has greatly expanded, and our knowledge of the temple s chronology of construction and decoration has dramatically improved. Nevertheless, while the temple model here constructed and described includes as many new discoveries as possible, each excavation season at Karnak brings fresh insights. Overtime, when such new information becomes available, some of the description given here will need to be modified, changed completely, or nuanced. Just as the temple itself evolved over time, our comprehension of the site will too, and by the end of the 21st century, we should expect that continuing excavations and new technology will allow us to visualize whole parts of the precinct in dramatically different ways. The following section highlights the significance of some of the changes presented above and aims to explain how archaeologists and scholars have reconstructed (usually only on paper) the features of the temple that are included in the model. A model rendering of Karnak in the Roman Era, circa 30 BCE. The Position of the Nile River in Relation to Karnak Visitors to Karnak today must walk almost a third of a mile (about half a kilometer) west from the temple s western quay and entrance to reach the Nile River. The river and its canals appear to have run further to the east in the Pharaonic periods, however, and their position may have directly impacted the development of the temple. The Middle Kingdom temple precinct would have been encircled by a large enclosure wall, much smaller than the later 30th Dynasty wall of Nectanebo I that gives the temple its form today. Archaeologists working at Karnak believe that this mud brick wall (not shown on the model), with sides over 250m each, would have run somewhere in front of the present third pylon on its western edge, and near the present eighth pylon on the south. Excavations near the eighth pylon may have uncovered the wall s southeast corner, and a section of the eastern wall may have been exposed near the sacred lake. The Nile s eastern bank at this time would have run close to this wall, limiting the expansion of the temple west75 (It has also recently been suggested that a branch of the river may have run along the temple s east side during the Middle Kingdom, drying up by the start of the New Kingdom; this would have initially limited the temple s expansion to the east as well76). Because only a small part of this huge wall has been identified, its location remains highly hypothetical. It was therefore not included on the model. 75 76 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 13 Graindorge 2002: Abb. 1; Van Siclen 2005a: 29, 32 and fig. 4; Carlotti 2005: 178-179 Larché 2007: 481; Grimal and Larché 2007: 43-45 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Throughout the life of the Amun-Ra temple, the river seems to have gradually shifted westward. A painted scene from the Theban tomb of a man named Neferhotep (Theban Tomb 49) implies that at some time in the 18th Dynasty, a giant T-shaped basin connected to the Nile by a canal was cut before the temple. It bordered a rectangular quay on its eastern edge.77 If the tomb painting s representation has been correctly interpreted, the basin was located in the vicinity of the later second pylon.78 This shift would have allowed the expansion of the temple slightly westward in the New Kingdom. The presence of a canal and basin may equally have limited further movement of the temple west at that time. The construction of the second pylon by Horemheb was the first major move west since the reign of Thutmose II. The expansion would have necessitated the filling in of the T-shaped basin and canal before the temple. If the river had continued its gradual movement away from the temple during the 18th Dynasty, new land would be available for another temple entrance and processional to the west. About 100 years after Horemheb s death, Sety II and Ramesses III added bark shrines in front of the king s pylon, possibly lining the entrance processional of the earlier king. The exact location of the Nile s east bank at this period remains unknown, but it could have stood near the location of the first pylon. The river s westward shift must have continued throughout the 20th and 21st Dynasties. Some time around the reign of Shoshenq I, when a new western temple entrance was constructed, a temple quay and a huge revetment wall were built. These were located about 90 meters (100 yards) to the west of the new gate and demarcate the position of the river in the start of the Third Intermediate Period.79 The river must have remained in the same area through the 25th Dynasty, as a paved stone ramp inscribed for Taharqo was built south of the quay, descending into the bordering Nile.80 A new section of the revetment wall has recently been discovered 50 meters south of the present quay by archaeologists of Egypt s Supreme Council of Antiquities. Their discovery showed that the stone wall, once thought to have been the side of a basin connecting the temple to the Nile by a canal, was instead a huge barrier built to protect Karnak from the Nile itself, which flowed immediately next to the temple. Inscriptions on the wall allowed archaeologists to date the revetment to the 22nd Dynasty.81 Other sections of the wall have been uncovered north of the quay, indicating the line of the river at that time.82 By the end of Ptolemaic rule in Egypt, the Nile had shifted further to the east, and the area around the temple s quay and revetment wall had silted up. Domesticstyle structures of Greco-Roman date popped up around Taharqa s river ramp and the Late Period chapel of Hakoris.83 New land was again becoming available, but the expansion of the temple had halted, and by the end of the Roman Period, Karnak would be closed. 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 14 Gitton 1974 Gitton 1974: fig. 1 El-Aref 2008 Lauffray 1979: 94-95 El-Aref 2008 Lauffray 1979: 92; Lauffray and Sauneron 1975: fig. 3 Lauffray 1971 The Development of the Temple of Karnak The King and Temple Expansion When the kings sponsored construction works at temples such as Karnak it not only demonstrated their power (both financial and territorial) but also their unique relationship with the gods. Since the success or failure of the nation hinged upon the king s ability to act as a divine intermediary, appeasing the gods and currying their favor for Egypt, it was of the utmost importance that the king himself was beloved of the gods. To prove their special status, and thus their legitimate right to rule over the nation, the kings built monumental temples covered with relief scenes depicting themselves praising, making offerings to, and embraced by the divinities. Those temples built by their famous ancestors could be restored or renewed in increased splendor, associating the kings with the glories of the past and situating them within the desired royal tradition. At Karnak, many inscriptions describe how pharaoh repaired or refurbished the buildings of his esteemed predecessors. While some kings modified the existing temple, others chose to extend its borders. The Middle Kingdom Court Most maps of Karnak have a large blank square in the middle of the temple, the area of the Middle Kingdom court. It appears that the early temple had been destroyed during ancient times, with only three granite thresholds remaining from the original structure. Nothing more of the structure s plan had been recovered during Henri Chevrier s excavations and clearing in the area.84 Luc Gabolde, an archaeologist working with the CFEETK, reinvestigated the area in the late 1990s. Gabolde recreated the form of the Senusret temple using the small amount of information on the form of the temple discovered during his excavations, as well as information from the blocks of Senusret I excavated at Karnak in the early 1900s and after. The recovered limestone building materials of the temple included fragments of square pillars and statues, and Gabolde has reconstructed a Middle Kingdom temple based on the form of the fragments.85 His reconstruction has been used for the model. A second, alternative reconstruction was recently offered by François Larché. He imagines a much smaller temple, possibly oriented towards the east.86 That a rectangular wall surrounded the Middle Kingdom temple is known from a number of pieces of evidence. Limestone doorjambs and lintels inscribed for Senusret I were discovered at the site near the Middle Kingdom court. Remains of the wall itself were unearthed during excavations around the temple s perimeter.87 The exact form of the wall can as yet only be projected, but that it would have extended west to the location of the later fourth pylon, influencing the form of the early New Kingdom temple, seems likely.88 The wall was included on the model to show the viewer how the Middle Kingdom temple might have been situated. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 15 The ruins of the Middle Kingdom court, showing a red granite threshold and a calcite altar. 84 85 86 87 88 Golvin and Goyon 1987: 75-76 Gabolde 1998, 1999 Larché 2007: 409-421 Gabolde 1998: 114-115; Charloux 2007: pl. IV Such as the form shown in: Graindorge 2002: Abb. 1 The Development of the Temple of Karnak The Southern Processional Routes The date and form of the earliest processional routes south from the temple remain speculative. Senusret I added a number of small shrines to Karnak, including the famous peripteral shrine, the white chapel. Its blocks were found in the third pylon and reconstructed in Karnak s Open Air Museum. Two other chapels of the king probably lined the important processional routes of the time. Work done by Charles Van Siclen in the court of the ninth pylon suggests that a small court (not pictured on the model) was located here in the Middle Kingdom. One of Senusret s shrines (also not pictured on the model) may have stood here on a brick platform. If so, it would be the earliest signs of a north/south directed processional route from Karnak. The destination of the route at this early period remains unknown, since the earliest evidence for temples to the south at Mut and Luxor come from the 18th Dynasty.89 In the reign of Hatshepsut, solid evidence for a north/south processional avenue between Karnak, Mut, and Luxor temples appears. The queen s pylon (the eighth) was added south of the core temple, and the calcite shrine of Amenhotep I (originally standing within the central section of the Amun temple) may have been moved just north of her new pylon to adorn the route.90 The queen s red chapel depicts the events that formed the Opet Festival, part of which included a procession south to Luxor temple. A Ramesside shrine at Luxor likely replaced one built by the queen before that temple. The temple of the goddess Mut was clearly an important cult site during the queen s reign as well, and reused blocks from the queen s temple there have recently been discovered during excavations at that site. Shrines for the movement of the god s bark in festival stand just north of the entrance to Mut s temple.91 The location and orientation of the temple of Khonsu, built by Ramesses III, can be best understood as related to the important southern processional routes. His temple faced south, and it seems to have had its own processional running in that direction. A powerful high priest of Amun during the 21st Dynasty named Pinedjem added pairs of ram-headed sphinxes (likely taken from the mortuary temple of Amenhotep III across the river) to this processional way.92 It did not connect with the route to Luxor, but instead connected to the temple s own basin and Nile canal, evidence for which has been found in recent excavations.93 The image of the child god Khonsu, as son of Amun and Mut, would have been an important part of the riverine festival processions, and his temple thus would have warranted its own launch for the god s sacred bark. The avenue from Karnak to Luxor must have been important from the New Kingdom onward. Its early form is unknown, but the processional may have paralleled the later route of Nectanebo I, known from its stone paving and hundreds of sphinxes.94 While this route was previously only exposed directly around 89 90 91 92 93 94 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 16 Bell 1997: 147-148 and note 61; Bryan 2005: 181; Ullmann 2007: 11 Blyth 2006: 36 Bell 1997: 147-149; Bryan 2005; Van Siclen 1987: 159-160, fig. 2 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 30; Cabrol 2001: 26-27, 239-255; Porter and Moss 1927: 77-79 El-Molla, Hegazy and Abd elHamid 1993: 246-247 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 118; Cabrol 2001: 283-287 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Karnak and Luxor temples, ongoing excavations by the Supreme Council of Antiquities within the present day city of Luxor have exposed numerous additional sections of the sphinx avenue south of the Mut temple. 95 The exact location of the entire pathway may one day be known. See the essay: Festival Processions for more information and maps demarcating the festival routes under different kings. The Western Sphinx-Lined Processional Route Karnak s present-day entrance allows visitors to walk over the ancient quay and through the western sphinx alleyway before approaching the temple s gate. While this layout reflects the Roman form of the temple s entrance, the line of sphinxes had a very different form in earlier periods. About 100 ram-headed sphinxes (crio-sphinxes) were discovered around the temple s first court and pylon during clearance in the beginning of the 20th century. Between the statues forepaws, small statuettes of a king were visible. The excavator attributed the assembling of the original sphinx alley to king Ramesses II, whose name was inscribed on these statuettes. However, more recent study of the style of these images instead suggests that they were carved during the mid-18th Dynasty. They were possibly arranged before Luxor temple by king Amenhotep III, then moved and usurped by Ramesses II to front his new court at the temple. Pinedjem, a high priest of Amun in the 21st Dynasty, usurped and positioned the Amenhotep III/Ramesses II sphinxes before the second pylon at the temple of Amun (the temple s entrance at the time).96 The exact arrangement and length of the statue-lined path is unknown, but they likely extended up to or past the area of the later first pylon to a quay. The construction of the first court by Shoshenq I must have enclosed many of the sphinxes along the western alleyway within its walls. It may have been at this time, or possibly later when the Taharqo kiosk was added, that these sphinxes were moved to line the north and south walls of the court.97 The model shows the latter option, with the sphinxes remaining in a single line during the additions of Shoshenq I, but this chronology of layout is only a suggestion. It was only with the reorganization of the western entranceway during the Roman period that the sphinxes were placed as we see them today.98 The western sphinx-lined processional way outside Pylon I. The Early 18th Dynasty Very little evidence for the form of the temple in the reign of Amenhotep I remains in situ. Decorated limestone blocks and fragments in the modern-day site storage magazines, all of which were excavated in various parts of the site in the 95 Mansour Boraik of the SCA was kind enough to allow the author to view these excavations. Cabrol 1995: 25-27, 2001: 206-208 Cabrol 2001: 209 Lauffray 1971 96 97 98 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 17 The Development of the Temple of Karnak 20th century, have been used to re-imagine Karnak at this period. The model reproduces some of the main elements of one scholar s reconstruction, showing one possible arrangement of the architectural features discovered. Many of Thutmose I s constructions, on the other hand, still stand at Karnak. Ruins of the fourth pylon and one of his two red granite obelisks remain on the temple site. The pylons of Thutmose II and the walls of his festival court were dismantled by Amenhotep III. Many of the inscribed blocks from these constructions were found in the third pylon, and they have been used by Egyptologists to reconstruct the court s general form.99 Fragments of the king s granite obelisks have also been recovered from Karnak, allowing scholars to estimate their height and width. Bases for two obelisks later subsumed by third pylon were revealed during excavations and clearance in the festival court. These almost certainly belonged to Thutmose s monuments.100 Hatshepsut s many works at Karnak still exist in some form. Her eighth pylon (with decorative scenes recarved by Amenhotep II) still graces the southern processional route. One of her red granite obelisks stands in the Wadjet hall, while part of its fallen pair has been put on display near the sacred lake. The queen s new sanctuary, the palace of Ma at, now encloses the temple s later bark chapel of Philip Arrhidaeus. Her second pair of obelisks at the eastern edge of Karnak were mostly destroyed, but they are mentioned in a quarry inscription at Aswan and depicted in the queen s temple at Deir el Bahri.101 The Wadjet hall Politically, Karnak took on new importance in the 18th Dynasty, as the pharaohs began to use the temple as a means of demonstrating their ordained selection as king by the gods. The enhancements of Thutmose I highlight this change, as one of his contributions to the temple was the addition of this special hall where coronation rituals took place with the god Amun sanctioning the choice.102 Various interpretations of the form of this hall under Thutmose I, Hatshepsut, and Thutmose III had until recently been based on early excavations in the area and a text of Thutmose III describing his changes within. However, CFEETK archaeologists made a number of finds in the hall that have altered our understanding of the hall. While consolidating the sandstone blocks of the fourth pylon, inscribed niches for seated statues of Thutmose I were discovered along the north tower s eastern face. The bases and lower sections of some of the sandstone images were still in place. Other excavations in the hall and a reconsideration of the materials found previously in the area allowed Jean-François A model reconstruction of the Wadjet hall in the reign of Thutmose I. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 18 99 Gabolde 1993 100 Gabolde 1987: pls. I and II 101 Habachi and Van Siclen 1977: 60-63, 68 102 Golvin and Goyon 1987: 44 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Carlotti and Luc Gabolde to reconstruct the many phases of construction within the hall, and it is their conclusions that have been used for the model.103 Even this may eventually have to be changed, as an alternative interpretation of this data, slightly modifying the chronology of the construction, has recently been offered by François Larché.104 Many of the larger Osiride statues of Thutmose I still stand in the hall today, although their faces have all been mutilated. An example of a painted and mostly complete head, possibly originally from one of these statues, has been used to recreate the original appearance of the standing figures. Thirty-six standing royal images would have lined the hall originally, those on the south side wearing the white crown (as shown on the model), those on the north wearing the double crown.105 The Central Bark Shrine The earliest bark shrine preserved from Karnak is the calcite shrine of Amenhotep I. Scholars studying this period of the temple suggest that it stood immediately outside the Middle Kingdom temple, sheltered by screen walls on its north and south sides.106 Amenhotep s shrine may have remained in its location until the reign Hatshepsut. At this point, the central area of Karnak was redesigned, and the queen s new sanctuary, the palace of Ma at, was built before the Middle Kingdom temple. The calcite shrine was moved, possibly to a location along the southern processional route near the queen s new pylon.107 In its stead, the queen commissioned the quartzite red chapel, a two-roomed chapel with low-relief decoration on its interior and exterior. After the construction of the palace of Ma at, a number of renovations within its interior increased the available central space to make room for the now completed chapel.108 The red chapel s time at the heart of the temple was limited. At some point in the reign of the queen s nephew, Thutmose III, the chapel was dismantled and its blocks stored somewhere in Karnak. The front and rear doors were reused in Thutmose s additions and renovations to the sanctuary and the court of the sixth pylon.109 The red chapel was replaced with a new granite shrine, of similar size and shape, and a new entrance portico was designed for the palace of Ma at. 110 It seems to have fared better than the red chapel, and served as the main bark shrine for hundreds of years. At some later distant moment, Thutmose s bark was damaged. This may have occurred during the invasions of Thebes in the 7th or 6th centuries. Amun s shrine was replaced with a granite replica, of similar size and shape, inscribed with The “Red Chapel”, now located in the Open Air Museum, once stood in the heart of Karnak, serving as a bark chamber. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 19 103 Carlotti and Gabolde 2003; Larché 2000: 31 104 Larché 2007 105 Bryan 2002 106 Graindorge 2002 107 Blyth 2006: 36 108 Carlotti 1995a; Nims 1966 109 Björkman 1971: 77-78; Dorman 1988: 54-65 110 Carlotti 1995a; Dorman 1988: 56-65 The Development of the Temple of Karnak scenes depicting the Macedonian king Philip Arrhidaeus as pharaoh. This is the bark shrine that stands today within the temple of Amun.111 Recently, one scholar has questioned whether the replacement of the central bark was actually accomplished by Nectanebo II (360-343), an earlier 30th Dynasty king, as part of broader renovations to the core of the Amun temple. If so, the bark was left uninscribed, only to be decorated later by Philip Arrhidaeus.112 The Mid 18th Dynasty The renovations of later kings have obscured many of Amenhotep II s contributions to Karnak. South of the eighth pylon, the king built a court with a pillared portico and a bark station with a pillared façade. The court s entrance was adorned with a small pylon and a colossal statue of the king. All these structures were pulled down and reused as building material for the edifice of Amenhotep II by Horemheb when he erected the ninth and tenth pylons. A thorough study of the blocks of the standing building has allowed this general reconstruction, but the exact plan and form for this court cannot yet be determined.113 It was therefore not included on the model. The king s small calcite shrine, whose walls were disassembled and reused in later periods, has been reconstructed at Karnak s Open Air Museum. The peristyle of Thutmose IV was partly dismantled and placed in the third pylon of Amenhotep III. About one thousand blocks, protected for over three thousand years from the sun and sand, were removed from the pylon in modern times and still retain traces of their original paint.114 Recently, the structure has been reconstructed in Karnak s Open Air Museum, along with the king s calcite bark shrine, also found in the pylon. Sections of the eastern half of the peristyle that were not removed from the Wadjet hall aided in locating its original position in the court.115 Although exact plans and measurements for the pillars were not available to the Digital Karnak Project, photographs of the CFEETK reconstruction of this feature were used to recreate it for the model. More details may soon be made available about the peristyle s plan, and the model will need to be changed to reflect this information. The third pylon of Amenhotep III remains in its original location within the temple, and the north tower s eastern face still maintains monumental relief scenes of the king. The king s contribution to the tenth pylon, however, has only recently been clarified. The presence of two colossal statues of the king flanking the door of the tenth pylon clearly indicated that the king had intended to build some type southern gateway on that location. The talatat fill within the pylon (from the buildings of the king s son, Akhenaten) demonstrated that he could not have constructed the tenth pylon itself. Horemheb, whose name was inscribed on the pylon s gateway, was assigned ownership of the towers.116 CFEETK ar- Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 20 111 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 131; Barguet 1962: 136-141 112 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 131-132 113 Van Siclen 2005a: 27, 39-41 and figs. 14-15, 2005b: 187-189 114 Bryan 1980: 222-224; Letellier 1979, 1991 115 Larché and Grimal 1993: VIII 116 Barguet 1962: 243-244 The Development of the Temple of Karnak chaeologists discovered that the foundations of the tenth pylon were in fact very different from those of Horemheb s second and ninth pylons. Close investigation of the architecture of the towers suggested that the tenth pylon had been commenced (presumably by Amenhotep III) and then abandoned with only a few courses of stone laid. Its construction was resumed under Horemheb, who took advantage of the mass of building material available in east Karnak to erect three pylons at the temple.117 The Late 18th Dynasty At least four buildings commissioned by Amenhotep IV/Akhenaten in east Karnak have been identified by the study of inscriptions on the talatat blocks removed from pylons at Karnak and Luxor. The location of most of the structures remains unconfirmed, but the largest and most important of these, the Gem-paAten, was discovered east of the Amun precinct in the 1920s. Only this temple, whose layout and location are (at least partly) known from these and later excavations, could be reconstructed with a reasonable attempt at accuracy. Few details exist regarding the interior of the temple, however, so this area had to be left blank on the model. Sometime in his fifth regnal year, Amenhotep IV changed his name to Akhenaten and launched a fervent attack on the existence of gods other than the solar deity Aten.118 Amun was a special target, and his name and figure was cut out of temples all over Egypt, including at Karnak. Shortly after, the king decided to leave the city of Thebes, and move the center of cult, the royal residence, and his burial site to Middle Egypt, in a city he named Akhetaten (modern day Tell el-Amarna). The wealth of the Amun Temple at Karnak was diverted to building projects for the new city, and the temple itself was closed.119 See the essay: Introduction to the Temple of Amun for more information on Akhenaten. After Akhenaten s death, the boy king Tutankhamun reopened many temples and reinstituted construction and decoration projects at the Thebes.120 To the south, along the temple s processional to the Mut temple, he added two lines of ram-headed sphinx statues. Study of the sphinxes suggests that they originally depicted Akhenaten and Nefertiti, and that the heads were removed and replaced with the image of a ram (the animal associated with the god Amun). The humanheaded sphinxes likely adorned the temples in east Karnak, and were moved and altered by Tutankhamun as part of his religious restoration projects.121 The structures of the final king of the 18th Dynasty, a former general named Horemheb, still stand at Karnak today. His three pylons and the edifice of 117 118 119 120 121 Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 21 Azim 1982: 146-153 Allen 1996 Redford 1984: 137-142 Redford 1984: 205-211 Cabrol 2001: 24-25, 221-227; Murnane and Eaton-Krauss 1991 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Amenhotep II have been discussed above (see the comments on Amenhotep II and III). It should be mentioned that the religious changes of Akhenaten by this time had fallen completely from favor. Horemheb systematically demolished Akhenaten s buildings at east Karnak and attempted to erase that king s name from history. The removal of these structures should be viewed as a specific policy against that king, and not as a typical act of reuse of another king s monuments. The proscription against Akhenaten s religion and family soon extended to Tutankhamun, and Horemheb usurped the sphinxes of his predecessor along the route to the Mut temple.122 The 19th Dynasty The construction of Karnak s famous hypostyle hall has been assigned to a variety of kings: Horemheb, Ramesses I, Sety I and Amenhotep III. Although the hall s interior walls, columns, and architraves were all decorated with the relief of Sety I and Ramesses II, some scholars questioned whether an earlier king raised the hall s central nave. Peter Brand performed a careful study of the hall and discovered that the majority of its walls had been decorated using scaffolding once the mud brick construction ramps had been removed. However, the highest parts, including the clerestory windows and architraves above the central nave, had been carved while the ramps remained in place. That these were inscribed by Sety I proved that it had been this king who was responsible for the hall s creation.123 Ramesses II s eastern temple for Amun-who-hears-prayers can be visited at Karnak today. The sphinxes and obelisks guarding the temple s east gate have been mostly destroyed, but the bases and socles upon which they stood have been identified outside the later Nectanebo I gateway.124 The small bark shrine of Sety II still remains in the temple s first court. The hypostyle hall at Karnak. The 20th Dynasty Ramesses III s bark shrine in the first court exists at Karnak today. His temple to Khonsu, further south, also remains in good condition. Many scholars think that this structure replaced an earlier temple to the child-god on the same location. Reused blocks of Amenhotep III in the bark sanctuary could suggest that Khonsu s temple existed in the mid 18th Dynasty or before, but these blocks could also have been taken from Amenhotep s defunct mortuary temple on the west bank for use as building material.125 The inscribed gateway of Ramesses IX still adorns the south door of the third pylon s narrow court. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 22 122 Barguet 1962: 242; Cabrol 2001: 226 123 Brand 2000: 201-219, plans 2-3 124 Golvin 1993: fig. 2 125 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 30; Lauffray 1979: 214; Survey 1979: xvi The Development of the Temple of Karnak The Third Intermediate Period (Dynasties 21-25) The sphinx avenues of the high priest of Amun Pinedjem have previously been discussed (see the two sections above on the western and southern processional routes). The grand court and inscribed Bubastite portal of Sheshonq I still stand at the temple. Only the western side of the court, removed for the construction of the first pylon by Nectanebo I, has disappeared. A hypothesized form of this wall and gate has been used for the reconstruction on the model.126 Small chapels dedicated to the funerary god Osiris appeared at Karnak during the early and late Third Intermediate Period (not included in the model). Generally, these were located to the north and north east of the Amun temple in small clusters. Many of these structures were decorated not only with scenes of the king, but of a series of important priestesses known as the god s wife of Amun. 127 Parts of Taharqo s buildings still grace the precinct. One column of his tencolumned kiosk stands in the first court, and the bases of the others provide the feature s basic layout. Only the lower column shafts of his entrance porch at the Khonsu temple remain, but entire columns and low walls from his porch at the eastern temple of Amun-Ra-who-hears-prayers have been physically reconstructed from blocks at the site. The lower section of his edifice of the lake and the structure s deep well are intact, and have been studied at length. Hypothetical reconstructions of the upper layer and building forecourt were used to re-imagine the space for the model.128 The Late Period (Dynasties 26 to 30) In the first half of the Late Period, Karnak experienced only limited amounts of construction, focused mainly on the addition of new small Osiris chapels.129 After a hiatus, construction at the temple resumed under the 29th Dynasty kings. The remains of the shena-wab of Psammuthis and the chapel of Hakoris at Karnak have been studied and the reconstructions of these buildings have been used for their representation in the model.130 King Nectanebo I of the 30th Dynasty altered Karnak dramatically with the construction of a series of huge mud brick enclosure walls. His work gave greater Karnak the shape by which we know it today. The Amun, Montu, and Mut temples were all given their own giant precinct walls, significantly reorganizing the sacred space of Thebes. Relief from the edifice of Taharqo. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 23 126 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 35-36 127 Coulon and Defernez 2004: 138; Leclant 1965: 23-36, 110-113; Redford 1973 128 Parker et al. 1979 129 Coulon and Defernez 2004 130 Arnold, Dieter 1999: 101-102; Lauffray 1995a: 22-23, 59; Traunecker 1987 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Nectanebo s first pylon serves as Karnak s western entrance today. It was never completed, and remains of the mud brick ramps used for its construction in ancient times can still be seen inside the first court. The Opet temple is also extant. It is currently undergoing an architectural study by the CFEETK, and the chronology of its construction may soon be clarified. The Greco-Roman Period The ruling dynasty formed by Alexander s general Ptolemy supported the traditional temples of Egypt, and Karnak continued to benefit from royal patronage. Ptolemy III s gate in the enclosure wall south of the Khonsu temple continues to be one of the most impressive features of the temple. The chronology of construction in the area remains difficult to understand, however, and its appearance in the temple s different phases cannot positively be determined. CFEETK archaeologists discovered the foundations and lower courses of two incomplete stone pylon towers that would have flanked the gate. An exact date could not be assigned to this construction, so whether this was intended as part of the 30th Dynasty construction remains unknown. It is possible that the stone pylon may have been meant to replace an earlier mud brick pylon on the same location.131 To build his new gateway, Ptolemy would have then needed to remove a section of the Nectanebo wall (and any earlier gate on the location), adding his own gate and subsequently repairing the wall.132 Henri Chevrier first uncovered the Osiris catacombs of Ptolemy IV during the 1950s. The CFEETK renewed excavations there in the 1990s and they have recovered thousands of pieces of painted plaster originally adhering to the interior walls of the building. The lower portions of the walls and their niches remain in situ, and this fact has allowed the CFEETK to suggest a reconstruction for the entire building.133 The modifications to the temple of Amun-Ra-who-hears-prayers in east Karnak were done using a regularized style of stone construction typical of the Ptolemaic period.134 A new door created in the western side of the pillared forecourt was inscribed by Ptolemy VIII, suggesting that the other additions date to his reign as well.135 The Bab el Amara Gate, built by Ptolemy III. Houses at Karnak Excavations around the mud brick wall of Thutmose III, near the modern-day bleachers for the temple s sound and light show, have revealed a number of houses inhabited by temple priests. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 24 131 Lauffray and Sauneron 1975: 26 132 Golvin and Hegazy 1993: 151-152 133 Leclére 1996, 2002; Leclére and Coulon 1998 134 Masson 2007 135 Barguet 1962: 228-240; Gallet 2007 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Along the south section of the wall, six habitations were originally dated to the early Third Intermediate Period. The best preserved of these houses show that they were small, rectangular mud brick dwellings with open courtyards, three to four interior rooms, and staircases leading to upper terraces.136 Renewed excavations in the area suggest however, that the date assigned to these buildings may be too early: materials found in a seventh building date to the first half of the Late Period. To the north, domiciles of temple priests dating to the Ptolemaic period were also discovered. The squarish mud brick buildings had interior courts and stairways leading to a roof or second floor.137 Some of these have been physically reconstructed at the site. While they were not constructed on the model, the plans of these houses can be easily seen on the maps of Karnak at these periods. The Karnak Model Not every structure existing at Karnak today could be reconstructed and placed on the virtual reality model. The small chapels dedicated to the funerary god Osiris in the Third Intermediate Period and Late Period were not reconstructed, for example, as insufficient evidence exists about the appearance of the upper portions of many of the structures. The architecture of the temple of Ptah, located just inside the north enclosure wall of Nectanebo I, has not yet been thoroughly studied. While the ground plan is well-known, here again published drawings and sections documenting the walls and roofing are lacking. Many additional features, such as the colonnade and columned porch of Shabaqo in areas north of the Amun temple, are known primarily from plans documenting their broken remains at the site. Little information on their height, appearance, or integration with the surrounding temple is available. Temple features that could not be reconstructed on the model have been placed on the series of chronological maps created to accompany the model and website. The temples and chapels at north Karnak (the precinct of Montu) and south Karnak (the precinct of Mut) could not at this time be included in the virtual reality reconstruction project. These areas, as well as Luxor temple further to the south, have been added to the chronological maps to provide the larger context in which the temple of Amun developed. It should be again stressed that the 3-D Virtual Reality model (in both the accompanying videos and the lower-quality model posted on Google Earth) represents the state of our knowledge today about the form of the temple. Many details have been left out, and many elements of the basic architecture of the reconstructed buildings are based on hypotheses and conjecture. The model Above: a model rendering of Karnak looking west during the reign of Thutmose III. Below: a rendering of Karnak in the Roman Era showing the unfinished first pylon. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 25 136 Lauffray 1979: 201-202; Lauffray, Sauneron and Anus 1969; Lauffray et al. 1975 137 Lauffray 1995b: 301-306 The Development of the Temple of Karnak cannot show us Karnak as it really was, because we will never know everything about a site so ancient. What the model does offer is an approximation of how buildings may have looked (in a very general way) and a chance to tour through this reconstructed space. As it is presented here, the model shows only one possible reconstruction of each building per king s reign. This is misleading, as the nature of the evidence means that sometimes Egyptologists have very different ideas about the appearance or architectural form of a single building. In the future, the model could be adjusted and expanded to show multiple reconstructions for those debated structures. As it is, new information gained through ongoing excavations at Karnak will most definitely change our understanding of the precinct and the modeled buildings, and the model will need to be continually modified to reflect the new reality. Conclusion As has been mentioned above, many of the structures upon which the model is based still stand at Karnak today. The remains of other features have been meticulously excavated and studied by Egyptologists, archaeologists and architects. But much of the greater precinct still waits investigation, and future work at the temple will likely clarify the chronology of some of the more confusing areas, as well as reveal currently unknown buildings and features. The story of Karnak continues. Short Citation: Sullivan 2008, The Development of the Temple of Karnak. Digital Karnak. Full Citation: Sullivan, Elaine, 2008, The Development of the Temple of Karnak. On Digital Karnak, Los Angeles. http://dlib.etc.ucla.edu/projects/Karnak. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 26 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Works Cited Allen, James 1996 The religion of Amarna. In The royal women of Amarna: images of beauty from ancient Egypt, ed. Dorothea Arnold, pp. 3-5. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. Amer, Amin 1999 The gateway of Ramesses IX in the Temple of Amun at Karnak. Warminster: Aris & Phillips. Arnold, Dieter 1999 Temples of the last pharaohs. New York: Oxford University Press. Arnold, Dorothea, (ed.) 1996 The royal women of Amarna: images of beauty from ancient Egypt. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. Azim, Michel 1982 La structure des pylônes d’Horemheb a Karnak. Cahiers de Karnak VII, pp. 127-166. Barguet, Paul 1962 Le temple d’Amon-Rê à Karnak; essai d’exégèse. Le Caire: Impr. de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale. Bell, Lanny 1997 The New Kingdom ‘Divine Temple’: The Example of Luxor. In Temples of Ancient Egypt, ed. Byron Shafer, pp. 127-184. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. --2002 Divine Kingship and the Theology of the Obelisk Cult in the Temples of Thebes. In Ägyptologische Tempeltagung: Würzburg, 23.-26. September 1999, Vol. 5, ed. Horst Beinlich. Ägypten und Altes Testament 33, pp. 17-46. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. Björkman, Gun 1971 Kings at Karnak. A study of the treatment of the monuments of royal predecessors in the early New Kingdom. Uppsala: Universitet. Blyth, Elizabeth 2006 Karnak: evolution of a temple. London: Routledge. Brand, Peter 2000 The monuments of Seti I: epigraphic, historical, and art historical analysis. Probleme der Ägyptologie 16. Bd. Leiden: Brill. --2004 “The Karnak Great Hypostyle Hall Project.” Jan. 2008, from http://history.memphis.edu/hypostyle/. --2007 Veils, votives, and marginalia: the use of sacred space at Karnak and Luxor. In Sacred space and sacred function in ancient Thebes, ed. Peter Dorman, and Betsy Bryan. Studies in ancient Oriental civilization 61, pp. 51-83. Chicago: Oriental Institue of the University of Chicago. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 27 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Bryan, Betsy 1980 The Reign of Tuthmosis IV. New Haven, Yale University. Ph.D. Dissertation --2002 object catalog 2: head of Thutmoses I. In The quest for immortality: treasures of ancient Egypt, ed. Erik Hornung, and Betsy Bryan, pp. 80-81. Washington, D.C.: National Gallery of Art. --2005 The Temple of Mut: New Evidence on Hatshepsut’s Building Activity. In Hatshepsut, from queen to Pharaoh, ed. Catharine Roehrig, pp. 181-183. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art Cabrol, Agnès 1995 Une représentation de la tombe de Khâbekhenet et les dromos de Karnaksud: nouvelles hypothèses. Les béliers du dromos du temple de Khonsou et l’intérieur de l’enceinte du temple de Mout. Cahiers de Karnak X, pp. 33-64. -2001 Les voies processionnelles de Thèbes. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta 97. Leuven: Peeters. Carlotti, Jean-François 1995a Mise au Point sur les dimensions et la localisation de la chapelle d’Hatshepsout à Karnak. Cahiers de Karnak X, pp. 141-166. --1995b Contribution à l’ étude métrologique de quelques monuments du temple d’AmonRê à Karnak. Cahiers de Karnak X, pp. 65-127. --2005 Considérations architecturales sur l’orientation, la composition et les proportions des structures du temple d’Amon-Rê à Karnak. Structure and significance: thoughts on ancient Egyptian architecture. ed. P. Jánosi. Wien, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 169-208. Carlotti, Jean-François, and Luc Gabolde 2003 Nouvelles données sur la Ouadjyt. Cahiers de Karnak XI, pp. 255-338. Charloux, Guillaume 2007 Karnak au Moyen Empire, l’enceinte et les fondations des magasins du temple dAmon-Rê. Cahiers de Karnak XII, pp. 191-225, 809-813. Chevrier, Henri 1940 Le temple reposoir de Séti II à Karnak. Caire: Imprimerie National Boulac. Coulon, Laurent, and Catherine Defernez 2004 La chapelle d’Osiris Ounnefer Neb-Djefaou à Karnak: rapport préliminaire des fouilles et travaux 2000-2004. Institut français d’archéologie orientale du Caire 104, pp. 135-190. Dorman, Peter 1988 The monuments of Senenmut: problems in historical methodology. London and New York: Kegan Paul International. El-Aref, Nevine 2008 How Pharoah sailed to Karnak. Al-Ahram weekly on-line. Cairo, Al-Ahram. 879. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 28 The Development of the Temple of Karnak El-Molla, Magdi, El-Sayed Hegazy, and Ma’arouf Abd el-Hamid 1993 L’allée sacrée du temple de Khonsou. Rapport sur les fouilles de l’avenue de sphinx à têtes de béliers effectuées en 1982-1983. Cahiers de Karnak IX, pp. 239-262. Gabolde, Luc 1987 à propos de deux obélisques de Thoutmosis II, dédiés à son père Thoutmosis I et érigés sous le règne d’Hatshepsout-pharaon à l’ouest du IVe pylône. Cahiers de Karnak VIII, pp. 143-158. --1993 La <<Cour de Fêtes>> de Thoutmosis II à Karnak. Cahiers de Karnak IX, pp. 1-100. --1998 Le “grand château d’Amon” de Sésostris 1er à Karnak : la décoration du temple d’Amon-Ré au Moyen empire. Mémoires de l’Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres tome 17. Paris: Diff. de Boccard. --1999 Aux origines de Karnak : les recherches récentes dans la “cour du Moyen Empire. Bulletin de la société d’égyptologie 23, pp. 31-49. Gallet, Laetitia 2007 Le temple d’Amon-qui-écoute-les-priéres à Karnak : Œuvre de Ramsès II ou d’un prédécesseur? In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Egyptologists = Actes du Neuvième Congrès international des égyptologues, Grenoble 6-12 September 2004, ed. Jean Claude Goyon, and Christine Cardin. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta 150, pp. 271-282. Leuven: Peeters. Gitton, Michel 1974 Le palais de Karnak. Bulletin de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale 74, pp. 63-73. Golvin, Jean-Claude 1993 Hatchepsout et les obelisques de Karnak. Les Dossiers d’Archaeologie 187 S, pp. 34-41. Golvin, Jean-Claude, and Jean Claude Goyon 1987 Les bâtisseurs de Karnak. Paris: Presses du CNRS. Golvin, Jean-Claude, and El-Sayed Hegazy 1993 Essai d’explication de la forme et des caractréistiques générales des grandes enceintes de Karnak. Cahiers de Karnak IX, pp. 145-156. Graindorge, Catherine 2002 Der Tempel des Amun-Re von Karnak zu Beginn der 18.Dynastie. In Ägyptologische Tempeltagung: Würzburg, 23.-26. September 1999, Vol. 5, ed. Horst Beinlich. Ägypten und Altes Testament 33, pp. 83-90. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. Grimal, Nicolas, and François Larché 2007 Karnak, 1998-2004. Cahiers de Karnak XII, pp. 7-59. Habachi, Labib, and Charles Van Siclen, (ed.) 1977 The Obelisks of Egypt: Skyscrapers of the Past. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 29 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Lacau, Pierre, and Henri Chevrier 1956 Une chapelle de Sésostris Ier à Karnak. Le Caire: Impr. de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale. --1977 Une chapelle d’Hatshepsout à Karnak. Le Caire: Institut français d’archéologie orientale du Caire. Larché, François 2000 New statues at Karnak. Egyptian archaeology 16 (Spring), p. 31. --2007 Nouvelles observations sur les monuments du Moyen et du Nouvel Empire dans la zone centrale du temple d’Amon. Cahiers de Karnak XII, pp. 407-592. Larché, François, and Nicolas Grimal 1993 Karnak, 1989-1992. Cahiers de Karnak IX, pp. V-XX. Larché, François, and Franck Burgos 2006 La chapelle Rouge: le sanctuaire de barque d’Hatshepsout/1: Fac-similés et photographies des scènes. Paris: Recherche sur les civilisations. Laroche-Traunecker, Françoise 1982 Données nouvelles sur les abords du temple de Khonsou. Cahiers de Karnak VII, pp. 313-337. Lauffray, Jean 1970 La colonnade-propylée occidentale de Karnak dite <<kiosque de Taharqa>> et ses abords. Kêmi: revue de philologie et d’archéologie égyptiennes et coptes 20, pp. 111-164. --1971 Abords occidentaux du premier pylône de karnak, le dromos, la tribune et les aménagements portuaires. Kêmi: revue de philologie et d’archéologie égyptiennes et coptes 21, pp. 77-144. --1975 La colonnade propylée occidentale de Taharqa à Karnak et les mâts à emblème. Compte-rendu de la seconde campagne de fouilles (1970-1971). Cahiers de Karnak V, pp. 77-92. --1979 Karnak d’Egypte, domaine du divin: dix ans der recherches archéologiques et de travaux de maintenance en coopération avec l’Egypte. Paris: Éditions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique. --1995a La chapelle d’Achôris à Karnak: les fouilles, l’architecture, le mobilier et l’anastylose. 1. Paris: Editions Recherche sur les civilisations. --1995b Maisons et ostraca ptolémaiques à l’est du lac sacré. Cahiers de Karnak X, pp. 301-348. Lauffray, Jean, and Serge Sauneron 1975 Rapport sur les travaux de Karnak: Activités du Centre franco-égyptien en 19701972. Cahiers de Karnak V, pp. 1-42. Lauffray, Jean, Serge Sauneron, and Pierre Anus 1969 Rapport sur les Travaux de Karnak. Kêmi: revue de philologie et d’archéologie égyptiennes et coptes 19, pp. 111-135. Lauffray, Jean, Ramadan Sa’ad, and Serge Sauneron 1975 Fouilles à l’est du Lac Sacré. Cahiers de Karnak V, pp. 26-30. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 30 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Leclant, Jean 1953 La colonnade Éthiopienne à l’est de la grande eneinte d’Amon à Karnak. Bulletin de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale 53, pp. 115-172. --1965 Recherces sur les monuments thebains de la XXVe dynastie dite ethiopienne. Bibliothèque d’étude. 36. Le Caire: Institut français d’archéologie orientale. Leclére, François 1996 A cemetery of Osirid figurines at Karnak. Egyptian archaeology 9, pp. 9-12. --2002 Fouilles dans le cimetière osirien de Karnak - travaux récents. Bulletin de la société d’égyptologie 153, pp. 24-44. Leclére, François, and Laurent Coulon 1998 La nécropole osirienne de la “Grande Place” à Karnak : Fouilles dans le secteur nord-est du temple d’Amon. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Egyptologists, Cambridge, 3-9 September 1995, ed. Christopher Eyre. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta 82, pp. 649-659. Leuven: Peeters. Legrain, Georges 1929 Les temples de Karnak. Bruxelles: Vromant & Co. Letellier, Bernadette 1979 La cour à péristyle de Thoutmosis IV à Karnak. Bulletin de la Société française d’égyptologie 84, pp. 33-49. --1991 Thoutmosis IV à Karnak: Hommage tardif rendu à un bâtisseur malchanceux. Bulletin de la Société française d’égyptologie 122, pp. 36 – 52. Masson, Aurélia 2007 Le quartier des prêtres du temple de Karnak: rapport préliminaire de la fouille de la Maison VII, 2001-2003. Cahiers de Karnak XII, pp. 593-655. Murnane, William, and Marianne Eaton-Krauss 1991 Tutankhamun, Ay, and the avenue of sphinxes between pylon X and the Mut precinct at Karnak. Bulletin de la société d’égyptologie 15, pp. 31-38. Nims, Charles 1966 The date of the dishonoring of Hatshepsut. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 93, pp. 97-100. Parker, Richard Anthony, Jean Leclant, and Jean Claude Goyon 1979 The edifice of Taharqa by the Sacred Lake of Karnak. Providence: Brown University Press. Porter, Bertha, and Rosalind Moss 1927 Topographical bibliography of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic texts, reliefs, and paintings: The Theban temples II. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Redford, Donald 1973 An Interim Report on the Second Season of Work at the Temple of Osiris, Ruler of Eternity, Karnak The journal of Egyptian archaeology 59, pp. 16-30. --1984 Akhenaten, the Heretic King. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 31 The Development of the Temple of Karnak Sa’ad, Ramadan 1970 Les travaux d’Aménophis IV au IIIe pylône du temple d’Amon Re’ à Karnak. Kêmi: revue de philologie et d’archéologie égyptiennes et coptes 20, pp. 187-193. Schwaller de Lubicz, R. A. 1999 The temples of Karnak. London: Thames & Hudson. Survey, University of Chicago Oriental Institute Epigraphic 1936 Reliefs and inscriptions at Karnak: Ramses III’s temple within the great inclosure of Amon. The University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications 24 and 35. II, ed. University of Chicago Oriental Institute Epigraphic Survey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. --1954 Reliefs and inscriptions at Karnak: The Bubastite portal. The University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications 74. III, ed. University of Chicago Oriental Institute Epigraphic Survey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. --1979 Scenes of King Herihor in the Court. The Temple of Khonsu 1. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. --1986 Reliefs and Inscriptions at Karnak: The battle reliefs of King Sety I. The University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications 107. IV, ed. University of Chicago Oriental Institute Epigraphic Survey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Traunecker, Claude 1987 les <<Temples Hauts>> de basse époque: un aspect du fonctionnement économique des temples. Revue d’égyptologie 38, pp. 147-162. Ullmann, Martina 2007 Thebes: Origins of a Ritual Landscape. In Sacred space and sacred function in ancient Thebes, ed. Peter Dorman, and Betsy Bryan. Studies in ancient Oriental civilization 61, pp. 3-25. Chicago: Oriental Institue of the University of Chicago. Van Siclen, Charles 1986 The Alabaster Shrine of King Amenhotep II. Brooklyn Museum Archaeological Expedition to the Precinct of the Goddess Mut at South Karnak. I. San Antonio: Brooklyn Museum. --1987 Amenhotep II, Shabako, and the Roman camp at Luxor. Varia aegyptiaca 3, pp. 157-165. --2005a La cour du IXe pylône à Karnak. Bulletin de la société d’égyptologie 163, pp. 27-46. --2005b Soundings south of the eighth pylon at Karnak. annales du service des antiquités de l’Égypte 79, pp. 187-189. Varille, Alexandre 1950 Description sommaire du sanctuarie oriental d’Amon-Rê à Karnak. annales du service des antiquités de l’Égypte 50, pp. 137-247. Wilkinson, Richard 2000 The complete temples of ancient Egypt. New York: Thames & Hudson. Sullivan 2008, Development. Digital Karnak. 32 ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/25/2010 for the course AN N EA 130 taught by Professor Staff during the Winter '08 term at UCLA.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online