Chapter 6

Chapter 6 - Feiners message caused a clear-and-present...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–8. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Chapter 6 Words of Provocation 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Provocation to Anger Hate speech Expression that insults and degrade groups. . . Controlling hate speech Cannot be eradicated Drive underground Much of it is protected political speech Supreme Court definition: Words that “by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.” 2
Background image of page 2
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire Chaplinsky conviction Supreme Count upheld ruling: Epithets likely to provoke physical retaliation are not protected under the First Amendment Chaplinsky’s comments were “fighting words,” their very utterance: Inflicted injury Worthwhile v. Worthless speech 3
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Notable Cases Terminiello v. Chicago (1949) Court: The conviction was based on an overbroad interpretation that violated free speech And, Terminiello was not creating a clear- and-present danger Feiner v. New York (1951) The Supreme Court upheld the conviction
Background image of page 4
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 6
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 8
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Feiners message caused a clear-and-present danger 4 Fighting Words Expression has Constitutional protection unless: It provokes another person to violence Or creates a clear-and-present danger Cohens jacket: The language was not erotic Was not directed at anyone in particular A person could choose not to look 5 Fighting Words Georgia statute vague and overbroad Cohen and Gooding more clearly defined the fighting words doctrine Be spoken to another person face-to-face And, incite an immediate breach of the peace The Court dropped the inflict injury on the sensibilities of others clause 6 Words that Wound College incidences Racist speech R.A.V. v. St. Paul 7 Threats Watts v. United States Virginia v. Black Other cases, other threats University conduct codes 8...
View Full Document

Page1 / 8

Chapter 6 - Feiners message caused a clear-and-present...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 8. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online