Champion v Ames (lottery case)

Champion v Ames (lottery case) - The Court emphasized the...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Champion v. Ames (Lottery Case) 1903 I. Facts a. The defendants in the case were arrested and convicted under an Act of Congress of 1895 that made it illegal to send or conspire to send lottery tickets across state lines. b. II. Legal Questions presented a. Did the transport of lottery tickets by independent carriers constitute "commerce" that Congress could regulate under the Commerce Clause? b. III. Answers a. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that lottery tickets were indeed "subjects of traffic," and that independent carriers may be regulated under the Commerce Clause.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: The Court emphasized the broad discretion Congress enjoys in regulating commerce, noting that this power "is plenary, is complete in itself, and is subject to no limitations except such as may be found in the Constitution." The Court argued that Congress was merely assisting those states that wished to protect public morals by prohibiting lotteries within their borders. IV. Reasons (by ___) a. Form of argument b. Legal doctrines V. Dissent reasons VI. Concurring reasons Notes...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/30/2010 for the course PLS 459 taught by Professor Lermack during the Fall '09 term at Bradley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online