{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

McCray v US

McCray v US - oleomargarine were constitutional The Court...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
McCray v U.S. 1904 I. Facts a. At the urging of dairy farmers, Congress passed an act imposing a tax of 10 cents per pound on oleomargarine that was artificially colored yellow. Noncolored margarine was taxed only one-quarter of a cent per pound. McCray, a licensed dealer, did not pay the higher tax while selling the colored product. After losing his case in lower courts, McCray appealed to the Supreme Court. b. II. Legal Questions presented a. Did the congressional act overstep the boundaries of the taxing powers established in the Constitution? b. III. Answers a. In a 6-to-3 decision, the Court held that the taxes levied on colored and noncolored
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: oleomargarine were constitutional. The Court held that the right of Congress to tax within its delegated powers was essentially "unrestrained," and that "no want of due process of law could possibly result" from exercises of that power. The Court argued that to question the purpose and motive of Congress in exerting its delegated powers would be to "usurp the functions of the legislative in order to control that branch of the government in the performance of its lawful duties." IV. Reasons (by ___) a. Form of argument b. Legal doctrines V. Dissent reasons VI. Concurring reasons Notes...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online