{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Duncan v. Kahanamoku

Duncan v. Kahanamoku - post hoc ruling the court ruled that...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Duncan v. Kahanamoku 1946 I. Facts a. While Duke Kahanamoku was a military police officer during World War II , he arrested Duncan for public intoxication . At the time, Hawaii , not yet a state, was being administered under the Hawaiian Organic Act which effectively instituted martial law on the island. Duncan was therefore tried by a military tribunal and appealed to the Supreme Court. In a
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: post hoc ruling, the court ruled that trial by military tribunal was, in this case, unconstitutional. b. II. Legal Questions presented a. b. III. Answers a. IV. Reasons (by ___) a. Form of argument b. Legal doctrines V. Dissent reasons VI. Concurring reasons Notes Pretty much a repeat of Ex Parte Milligan...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}