Palko v. Connecticut

Palko v. Connecticut - Cardozo formulated principles that...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Palko v. Connecticut 1937 I. Facts a. Frank Palko had been charged with first-degree murder. He was convicted instead of second-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The state of Connecticut appealed and won a new trial; this time the court found Palko guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced him to death. b. II. Legal Questions presented a. Does Palko's second conviction violate the protection against double jeopardy guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment because this protection applies to the states by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause? b. III. Answers a. The Supreme Court upheld Palko's second conviction. In his majority opinion,
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Cardozo formulated principles that were to direct the Court's actions for the next three decades. He noted that some Bill of Rights guarantees--such as freedom of thought and speech--are fundamental, and that the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause absorbed these fundamental rights and applied them to the states. Protection against double jeopardy was not a fundamental right. Palko died in Connecticut's electric chair on April 12, 1938. IV. Reasons (by ___) a. Form of argument b. Legal doctrines V. Dissent reasons VI. Concurring reasons Notes...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/03/2010 for the course PLS 460 taught by Professor Lermack during the Spring '10 term at Bradley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online