Powell v. Alabama

Powell v. Alabama - b III Answers a Yes The Court held that...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Powell v. Alabama 1932 I. Facts a. Nine black youths -- young, ignorant, and illiterate -- were accused of raping two white women. Alabama officials sprinted through the legal proceedings: a total of three trials took one day and all nine were sentenced to death. Alabama law required the appointment of counsel in capital cases, but the attorneys did not consult with their clients and had done little more than appear to represent them at the trial. This cases was decided together with Patterson v. Alabama and Weems v. Alabama. b. II. Legal Questions presented a. Did the trials violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: b. III. Answers a. Yes. The Court held that the trials denied due process because the defendants were not given reasonable time and opportunity to secure counsel in their defense. Though Justice George Sutherland did not rest the Court holding on the right-to-counsel guarantee of the Sixth Amendment, he repeatedly implicated that guarantee. This case was an early example of national constitutional protection in the field of criminal justice. IV. Reasons (by ___) a. Form of argument b. Legal doctrines V. Dissent reasons VI. Concurring reasons Notes...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/03/2010 for the course PLS 460 taught by Professor Lermack during the Spring '10 term at Bradley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online