Tilton v. Richardson

Tilton v. Richardson - secular purposes would have the...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Tilton v. Richardson 1970 I. Facts a. The federal Higher Education Facilities Act of 1963 provided construction grants to church-sponsored higher educational institutions. The grants were to be used for the construction of non-religious school facilities. The Act also stipulated that twenty years after the grant had been given, schools were free to use the buildings for any purpose. b. II. Legal Questions presented a. Did the Act violate the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment? b. III. Answers a. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that only the 20-year limitation portion of the Act violated the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment. The Court invalidated the 20- year clause, arguing that subsidizing the construction of facilities used for non-
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: secular purposes would have the effect of advancing religion. The Court held that the church-related institutions in question had not used their federally-funded facilities for religious activities, and that the facilities were "indistinguishable from a typical state university facility." The Court also held that the Act did not excessively entangle the government with religion, noting that college students were less susceptible to religious indoctrination, that the aid was of "nonideological character," and that one-time grants did not require constant state surveillance. IV. Reasons (by ___) a. Form of argument b. Legal doctrines V. Dissent reasons VI. Concurring reasons Notes...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online