Reynolds v. United States

Reynolds v. United States - statute can punish criminal...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Reynolds v. United States 1878 I. Facts a. George Reynolds, secretary to Mormon Church leader Brigham Young, challenged the federal anti-bigamy statute. Reynolds was convicted in a Utah territorial district court. His conviction was affirmed by the Utah territorial supreme court. b. II. Legal Questions presented a. Does the federal anti-bigamy statute violate the First Amendment's free exercise clause because plural marriage is part of religious practice? b. III. Answers a. No. Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite, writing for a unanimous court, held that the
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: statute can punish criminal activity without regard to religious belief. The First Amendment protected religious belief, but it did not protect religious practices that were judged to be criminal such as bigamy. Those who practice polygamy could no more be exempt from the law than those who may wish to practice human sacrifice as part of their religious belief. IV. Reasons (by ___) a. Form of argument b. Legal doctrines V. Dissent reasons VI. Concurring reasons Notes...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online