ANSWERS-CH03 - CHAPTER 3 BUSINESS AND THE CONSTITUTION...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CHAPTER 3 BUSINESS AND THE CONSTITUTION ANSWERS TO CHAPTER 3 True-False Multiple Choice 1. T 2. T 3. F 4. T 5. T 6. F 7. F 8. F 9. F 10. T 11. T 12. F 13. T 14. a 15. d 16. c 17. d 18. a 19. d 20. c 21. c 22. a 23. c 24. d Short Essay 25. In this case, manufacturers of such products challenged a California law. The court applied the intermediate scrutiny test because it identified this as a law regulating commercial speech. Under the test, the law survived constitutional challenge because it directly advanced an important government interest (protecting consumers from confusing or misleading advertising.) 26. The three likely challenges are: (1) An equal protection claim . The challenged classification would be the distinction between State X's treatment of in-state peaches and its treatment of out-of-state peaches. Because no suspect classification or fundamental right is involved, rational basis review would apply. The relevant state purpose, protection of the public health, certainly is at least "legitimate." Because there might be a small degree of truth to the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 2

ANSWERS-CH03 - CHAPTER 3 BUSINESS AND THE CONSTITUTION...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online