ANSWERS-CH16 - CHAPTER 16 WRITING ANSWERS TO CHAPTER 16...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CHAPTER 16 WRITING ANSWERS TO CHAPTER 16 True-False Multiple Choice 1. F 2. F 3. T 4. F 5. F 6. F 7. T 8. F 9. T 10. T 11. F 12. T 13. a 14. d 15. a 16. c 17. c 18. a 19. c 20. b 21. a 22. c 23. a 24. c Short Essay 25. The parol evidence rule provides that when parties enter into a written contract that they intend to integrate all the terms of their agreement, a court will not permit use of evidence or prior or contemporaneous statements to add to, alter, or contradict the terms of the written contract. So if A buys a car from B, and there is no mention of a warranty in the written contract, A would be prevented from introducing evidence that the parties had orally agreed to a warranty, so long as the written contract is intended to express the agreement of the parties. 26. CSAC should argue that the parol evidence rule bars Hefty from presenting evidence of the alleged promise about 4% of the profits. The parties' written contract was a complete integration and the alleged promise regarding the profits was a
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

ANSWERS-CH16 - CHAPTER 16 WRITING ANSWERS TO CHAPTER 16...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online