{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

ANSWERS-CH21 - impracticable In making the argument Acme...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CHAPTER 21 PERFORMANCE OF SALES CONTRACTS ANSWERS TO CHAPTER 21 True-False Multiple Choice 1. F 2. T 3. F 4. T 5. T 6. T 7. F 8. F 9. T 10. F 11. a 12. d 13. b 14. c 15. d 16. b 17. a 18. c 19. b 20. d Short Essay 21. G does not have the right to inspect the rug before he pays for it, but if there is an obvious defect in the rug which he can see without inspecting it, he can reject the rug before paying for it. Otherwise, he must pay for the rug first and then, if he finds it is defective, he may pursue remedies against the seller for delivery of nonconforming goods. 22. Acme should argue the defense of commercial impracticability , which in compelling cases may relieve a party to a contract for the sale of goods from liability on the contract because unforeseeable and uncontrollable events have made performance
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: impracticable. In making the argument, Acme should stress that the strike came without warning and without Acme's having any prior reason to believe it could occur. Acme should also argue that despite its best efforts, it could hire only a token number of replacement workers. 23. Tureen, a merchant, must follow any reasonable instructions the seller gives him regarding disposition of the peaches. Even if the seller gives no disposition instructions, Tureen must make a reasonable effort to resell the peaches on the seller's behalf because they are perishable goods. Business Law and the Regulatory Environment, 11E 41...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online