ANSWERS-CH36 - CHAPTER 36 THIRD-PARTY RELATIONS OF THE PRINCIPAL AND THE AGENT ANSWERS TO CHAPTER 36 True-False 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 T

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CHAPTER 36 THIRD-PARTY RELATIONS OF THE PRINCIPAL AND THE AGENT ANSWERS TO CHAPTER 36 True-False Multiple Choice 1. T 2. F 3. T 4. F 5. T 6. T 7. F 8. T 9. T 10. T 11. F 12. F 13. T 14. T 15. a 16. c 17. d 18. b 19. a 20. a 21. b 22. a 23. c 24. c 25. d Short Essay 26. Whether P is liable depends on whether A was an employee or an independent contractor. The facts are such that A would likely be considered an employee because of the considerable control P exercised over the work even though P did not treat A as an employee for tax purposes. . This would be especially true if A did no work for anyone else while he worked for P. 27. An example is the above situation. If A is considered an employee, and the tort occurred during the course of the roofing work, P would be liable under this doctrine for the negligence that harmed the third party. Answers to Student Study Guide and Workbook Questions 60
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
28. Smith is incorrect. She is liable on the contract because Jones had apparent authority
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/30/2010 for the course BUSLAW 301 taught by Professor Abu during the Spring '09 term at Abu Dhabi University.

Page1 / 2

ANSWERS-CH36 - CHAPTER 36 THIRD-PARTY RELATIONS OF THE PRINCIPAL AND THE AGENT ANSWERS TO CHAPTER 36 True-False 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 T

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online