78106_22_Web_Ch22A_p01-06 - WEB EXTENSION 22A Multiple...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
WEB EXTENSION 22A Multiple Discriminant Analysis A s we have seen, bankruptcy or even the possibility of bankruptcy can cause significant trauma for a firm s managers, investors, suppliers, customers, and community. Thus, it would be beneficial to be able to predict the likelihood of bankruptcy so that steps could be taken to avoid it or at least to reduce its impact. One approach to bankruptcy prediction is multiple discriminant analysis (MDA) , a statistical technique similar to regression analysis. In this extension, we discuss MDA in detail and illustrate its application to bankruptcy prediction. 1 Suppose a bank loan officer wants to segregate corporate loan applications into those likely to default and those unlikely to default. Assume that data for some past period are available on a group of firms that includes companies that went bankrupt as well as com- panies that did not. For simplicity, we assume that only the current ratio and the debt/ assets ratio are analyzed. These ratios for our sample of firms are given in Columns 2 and 3 at the bottom of Figure 22A-1. The Xs in the graph represent firms that went bankrupt; the dots represent firms that remained solvent. For example, Firm 2, which had a current ratio of 3.0 and a debt ratio of 20%, did not go bankrupt. Therefore, its current ratio and its debt/assets ratio are marked with a single dot in the two- dimensional graph; this dot is labeled A and is shown in the upper left section of the graph. Firm 19, which had a current ratio of 1.0 and a debt ratio of 60%, did go bank- rupt, so an X is used to mark its current ratio and debt/assets ratio. This X is labeled B and is shown in the lower right section of Figure 22A-1. The objective of discriminant analysis is to construct a boundary line through the graph such that firms on one side of the line are unlikely to become insolvent whereas those on the other side are likely to go bankrupt. This boundary line is called the discriminant function , and in our example it takes this form: Z ¼ a þ b 1 ð Current ratio Þþ b 2 ð Debt ratio Þ Here Z is called the Z score , the term a is a constant, and b 1 and b 2 indicate the effects of the current ratio and the debt ratio on the probability of a firm going bankrupt. Although a full discussion of discriminant analysis would go well beyond the scope of this book, some useful insights may be gained by observing the following six points. 1 This section is based largely on the work of Edward I. Altman, especially these three papers: (1) Finan- cial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis, and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy, Journal of Finance , September 1968, pp. 589 609; (2) with Robert G. Haldeman and P. Narayanan, Zeta Analysis: A New Model to Identify Bankruptcy Risk of Corporations, Journal of Banking and Finance , June 1977, pp. 29 54; and (3) John Hartzell and Matthew Peck, Emerging Market Corporate Bonds, A Scoring Sys- tem, Emerging Corporate Bond Research: Emerging Markets, Salomon Brothers , May 15, 1995. The last arti-
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/03/2010 for the course FRR 3032 taught by Professor Mr.wroshr during the Spring '10 term at Crafton Hills College.

Page1 / 6

78106_22_Web_Ch22A_p01-06 - WEB EXTENSION 22A Multiple...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online