This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: International Macroeconomics 1 Stephanie SchmittGroh e 2 Mart n Uribe 3 This draft: Spring 2009 1 The seeds for this manuscript were lecture notes taken by Alberto Ramos in a course on International Finance that Mike Woodford taught at the University of Chicago in the Winter of 1994. 2 Columbia University. Email: stephanie.schmittgrohe@columbia.edu. 3 Columbia University. Email: martin.uribe@columbia.edu. Chapter 2 A Theory of Current Account Determination In this chapter, we build a model of an open economy, that is, of an economy that trades in goods and financial assets with the rest of the world. We then use that model to study the determinants of the trade balance and the current account. In particular, we study the response of consumption, the trade balance, and the current account to a variety of economic shocks, such as changes in income and the world interest rate. We pay special attention to how those responses depend on whether the shocks are of a permanent or temporary nature. 2.1 A TwoPeriod Economy Consider an economy in which people live for two periods, 1 and 2, and are endowed with Q 1 units of goods in period 1 and Q 2 units in period 2. Goods are assumed to be perishable in the sense that they cannot be stored from one period to the next. In addition, households are assumed to be endowed with B * units of a bond. In period 1, these bond holdings generate interest income in the amount of r B * , where r denotes the interest rate on bonds held between periods 0 and 1. In period 1, the households income is given by the sum of interest on its bond holdings and its endowment of goods, r B * + Q 1 . The household can allocate its income to two alternative uses: purchases of consumption goods, which we denote by C 1 , and purchases of bonds, B * 1 B * , where B * 1 denotes bond holdings at the end of period 1. Thus, in period 1 the household faces the following budget constraint: C 1 + B * 1 B * = r B * + Q 1 . (2.1) 21 22 S. SchmittGroh e and M. Uribe Similarly, in period 2 the representative household faces a constraint stating that consumption expenditure plus bond purchases must equal income: C 2 + B * 2 B * 1 = r 1 B * 1 + Q 2 , (2.2) where C 2 denotes consumption in period 2, r 1 denotes the interest rate on assets held between periods 1 and 2, and B * 2 denotes bond holdings at the end of period 2. As explained in chapter 1, by the noPonzigame constraint households are not allowed to leave any debt at the end of period 2, that is, B * 2 must be greater than or equal to zero. Also, because the world is assumed to last for only 2 periods, agents will choose not to hold any positive amount assets at the end of period 2, as they will not be around in period 3 to spend those savings in consumption. Thus, asset holdings at the end of period 2 must be exactly equal to 0: B * 2 = 0 . (2.3) Combining the budget constraints (2.1) and (2.2) and the terminal condition (2.3) to eliminate B * 1 and B * 2 , gives rise to the following lifetime budget...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 05/06/2010 for the course ECON Econ 365 taught by Professor Hnatkovska during the Spring '09 term at The University of British Columbia.
 Spring '09
 Hnatkovska
 Macroeconomics

Click to edit the document details