330 HW 1 - MAT 330 Fourier Series and Partial Differential...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MAT 330: Fourier Series and Partial Differential Equations Professor Sergiu Klainerman Problem Set 1 Rik Sengupta rsengupt @ princeton.edu February 6, 2010 1. Stein and Shakarchi, p. 24, problem 4 For z ∈ C , we define the complex exponential by e z = ∞ X n =0 z n n ! . (a) Prove that the above definition makes sense, by showing that the series converges for every complex number z . Moreover, show that the convergence is uniform on every bounded subset of C . Solution. First we will show that the definition makes sense. We will use the ratio test to show that, once we fix z ∈ C , the function e z as defined in the problem is well-defined, i.e. the series is convergent. Recall that the ratio test states that the series ∞ X n =0 a n with nonzero terms a j ∈ C converges and diverges according as the quantity L = lim n →∞ a n +1 a n is less than or greater than 1. For L = 1, the ratio test is inconclusive. So here, first of all, it is easy to see that e is simply 1, from the power series definition, and therefore the case z = 0 is well-defined. If z 6 = 0, then the premises of the ratio test are satisfied, i.e. for all terms are nonzero complex numbers. Then, lim n →∞ a n +1 a n = lim n →∞ z n +1 z n · n ! ( n + 1)! = lim n →∞ z n + 1 = lim n →∞ | z | n + 1 = 0 < 1 . 1 So, the series converges uniformly for fixed z ∈ C , and therefore is well-defined as a function. So, the definition makes sense. We will show uniform convergence on the bounded sets of C by means of the Weierstrass M-test. Recall that the Weierstrass M-test states that, given a sequence of real or complex valued functions { f n } on a set A , with positive constants M n ∈ R satisfying | f n ( x ) | ≤ M n for all x ∈ A , for every n ≥ 1, the series ∞ X n =1 f n ( x ) converges uniformly on A if the series ∞ X n =1 M n ( x ) converges. So now, notice that any bounded subset of C by definition is a subset of some neighbor- hood N r of radius r of the origin in the complex plane. We are looking for an upper bound M n on each term of the series, with M n independent of the position in the subset considered, i.e. a term M n for each term satisfying z n n ! ≤ M n , ∀ z ∈ N r . But such terms are easy to find, because we have z n n ! = | z | n n ! ≤ r n n ! , so we can simply take M n = r n n ! . So, from the Weierstrass M-test, it is now enough to check that ∑ M n is convergent. Again, this is trivial, and this can be done most easily with the ratio test once again. It is easy to see that lim n →∞ M n +1 M n = lim n →∞ r n +1 r n · n ! ( n + 1)! = lim n →∞ r n + 1 = 0 < 1 . So, the series ∑ M n is convergent, and therefore, by the Weierstrass M-test, the original series e z = ∞ X n =0 z n n !...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/07/2010 for the course MAT 330 taught by Professor Sergiuklainermann during the Spring '10 term at Princeton.

Page1 / 17

330 HW 1 - MAT 330 Fourier Series and Partial Differential...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online