PLS 460 Bowers v Hardwick

PLS 460 Bowers v Hardwick - challenging the...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Bowers v Hardwick 478 U.S. 186 (1986) CASE SUMMARY PROCEDURAL POSTURE: On certiorari, the state challenged a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, that ruled that Ga. Code Ann. § 16-6-2 unconstitutionally violated respondent's fundamental rights under the due process clause, U.S. Const. amend. XVI , in that it criminalized consensual sodomy. OVERVIEW: Respondent was charged with violating O.G.C.A. § 16-6-2 (1984), which criminalized sodomy. Respondent allegedly engaged in sodomy with another adult male in the bedroom of his home. After the district attorney decided not to present the matter to the grand jury unless further evidence developed, respondent brought suit in federal district court,
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: challenging the constitutionality of the statute insofar as it criminalized consensual sodomy. The court of appeals held that 16-6-2 violated respondent's fundamental rights because his homosexual activity was a private and intimate association that was beyond the reach of state regulation by reason of U.S. Const. amends. XI and XIV . Reversing that judgment, the Court held that the Due Process Clause of U.S. Const. amend. XIV did not confer any fundamental right on homosexuals to engage in acts of consensual sodomy, even if the conduct occurred in the privacy of their own homes. OUTCOME: The Court reversed the court of appeals' decision....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/04/2010 for the course PLS 460 taught by Professor Lermack during the Spring '10 term at Bradley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online