PLS 460 Abrams v United States

PLS 460 Abrams v United States - Justice Holmes and...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Abrams v United States Supreme Court of the United States, 1919 250 U.S. 616, 40 S.Ct. 17 Abrams was charged with violation of Espionage Act of 1918. He was accused of producing and distributing circulars which spoke against the United States attempting to encourage resistance to the war and harm production of war materials. Abrams was convicted in the federal district court. The legal question is was Abrams freedom of Speech rights violated. The court decided against Abrams. The court considered Abrams a big enough threat to the country that is was ok to violate his first amendment rights.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Justice Holmes and Brandeis dissented. They argued that Abrams actions did not meet the clear and present danger test. Abrams did not have the ability or intent to carry out the message in his circulars. Notes: Similar opinion to Schenk. Holmes thought this should not have been up held. It was a misapplication of the clear and present danger test. It is not clear exactly what the difference in intent between this case and Schenk. It is likely though that it is ability and influence of the person. Later has been over ruled....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/04/2010 for the course PLS 460 taught by Professor Lermack during the Spring '10 term at Bradley.

Page1 / 2

PLS 460 Abrams v United States - Justice Holmes and...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online