Unformatted text preview: a plurality opinion, conceded that nude dancing was a form of expressive activity. But he maintained that the public indecency statute is justified despite the incidental limitations on such expressive activity. The statute "furthers a substantial government interest in protecting order and morality." The proscription on public nudity is unrelated to the erotic message the dancers seek to convey. Decisions Decision: 5 votes for Barnes, 4 vote(s) against Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly...
View Full Document
- Spring '10
- Supreme Court of the United States, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Public nudity, public indecency statute, totally nude dancers, Glen Theatre Inc